Characterization of growth and development of sorghum genotypes with differential susceptibility to Striga hermonthica
D. Kawa, T. Taylor, B. Thiombiano, Z. Musa, H. Vahldick, A. J. Walmsley, A. K. Bucksch, H. Bouwmeester, S. M. Brady
Abstract
Variation in strigolactone composition in sorghum root exudates underlies its resistance to the parasitic weed, Striga hermonthica. Root exudates of the Striga susceptible variety Shanqui Red (SQR) contain primarily 5-deoxystrigol, which has a high efficiency of inducing Striga germination. SRN39 roots primarily exude orobanchol, leading to reduced Striga germination and making this variety resistant to Striga. This structural diversity in exuded strigolactones is determined by the polymorphism in the LGS1 (LOW GERMINATION STIMULANT 1) locus. Yet, the effects of the lgs1 mutation as well as the consequences of the vast genetic diversity between SQR and SRN39 have not been addressed in terms of growth and development. Here, we demonstrate additional consequences of LGS1 loss-of-function by phenotypic and molecular characterization. A suite of genes related to metabolism was differentially expressed between SQR and SRN39. Increased levels of gibberellin precursors in SRN39 were accompanied with its slower growth rate and developmental delay and we observed an overall increased SRN39 biomass. The slow-down in growth and differences in transcriptome profiles of SRN39 were strongly associated with plant age. Additionally, analyses of multiple LGS1 loss-of-function genotypes indicated that strigolactone stereochemistry influences root system architecture. In summary, we demonstrate that the consequences of the lgs1 mutation reach further than the changes in strigolactone profile in the root exudate and translate into alterations in growth and development. HighlightSRN39 and Shanqui Red are models for sorghum genotypes that are resistant and susceptible, respectively, to Striga hermonthica. Additional differences in plant growth, development, and hormone abundance should be considered when assessing Striga tolerance.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Strigolactone effects on Sorghum bicolor ecophysiology and symbioses
Chloee M. McLaughlin, Margarita Takou, … Jesse R. Lasky·PLANT PHYSIOLOGYPeer-reviewed·Jul 23, 2026
- A transcriptome atlas of Striga hermonthica germination
G. Irafasha, S. Mutinda, … S. Runo·bioRxiv·Dec 14, 2022
- Canonical Strigolactones Are Not the Tillering-Inhibitory Hormone but Rhizospheric Signals in Rice
S. Ito, J. Braguy, … S. Al-Babili·bioRxiv·Apr 5, 2022
- Resolving intergenotypic Striga resistance in sorghum
S. Mutinda, F. M. Maati, … S. Runo·bioRxiv·Dec 8, 2022
- A unique sulfotransferase-involving strigolactone biosynthetic route in Sorghum
- The soil microbiome reduces Striga infection of sorghum by modulation of host-derived signaling molecules and root development
D. Kawa, B. Thiombiano, … S. M. Brady·bioRxiv·Nov 6, 2022