bioRxivBiophysics
Likelihood-based estimation of substructure content from single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (SAD) intensity data
Abstract
SAD phasing can be challenging when the signal-to-noise ratio is low. In such cases, having an accurate estimate of substructure content can determine whether or not the substructure of anomalous scatterer positions can successfully be determined. We propose a likelihood-based target function to accurately estimate the strength of the anomalous scattering contribution directly from measured intensities, determining a complex correlation parameter relating the Bijvoet mates as a function of resolution. This gives a novel measure of intrinsic anomalous signal. The SAD likelihood target function also accounts for correlated errors in the measurement of intensities from Bijvoet mates, which can arise from the effects of radiation damage. When the anomalous signal is assumed to come primarily from a substructure comprised of one anomalous scatterer with a known value of f" and when the protein composition of the crystal is estimated correctly, the refined complex correlation parameters can be interpreted in terms of the atomic content of the primary anomalous scatterer, before the substructure is known. The maximum likelihood estimation of substructure content was tested on a curated database of 357 SAD cases with useful anomalous signal. The prior estimates of substructure content are highly correlated to the content determined by phasing calculations, with a correlation coefficient (on a log-log basis) of 0.72. SynopsisAn intensity-based likelihood method is provided to estimate scattering from an anomalous substructure considering the effect of measurement errors in Bijvoet pairs and correlations between those errors.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The hidden treasure in your data: Phasing with unexpected weak anomalous scatterers from routine datasets
Raghurama P. Hegde, Steven C. Almo, Udupi A. Ramagopal·bioRxiv·Aug 8, 2016
- Native SAD Phasing at Room Temperature
J. B. Greisman, K. M. Dalton, … D. R. Hekstra·bioRxiv·Dec 13, 2021
- Identifying dynamic, partially occupied residues using anomalous scattering
S. Rocchio, R. Duman, … S. Horowitz·bioRxiv·May 20, 2019
- Evaluating crystallographic likelihood functions using numerical quadratures
P. H. Zwart, D. E. Perryman·Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 27, 2020
- In the AlphaFold era, when is experimental phasing of protein crystals still required?
Ronan M. Keegan, Adam J. Simpkin, Daniel John Rigden·bioRxiv·Jul 19, 2024
- cFAR and Relative Signal: Diagnosing Preferred Orientation in Single-Particle Cryo-EM
Valentin Peretroukhin, Michael McLean, Ali Punjani·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2026