PLoS ONENeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Exploring Disturbance as a Force for Good in Motor Learning
Jack BrookesiD, Faisal MushtaqiD, Earle Jamieson, Aaron J. FathiD, Geoffrey P. BinghamiD, Peter CulmeriD, Richard McGilchrist WilkieiD, Mark A Mon-WilliamsiD
Abstract
Disturbance forces facilitate motor learning, but theoretical explanations for this counterintuitive phenomenon are lacking. Smooth arm movements require predictions (inference) about the force-field associated with a workspace. The Free Energy Principle (FEP) suggests that such active inference is driven by surprise. We used these insights to create a formal model that explains why disturbance helps learning. In two experiments, participants undertook a continuous tracking task where they learned how to move their arm in different directions through a novel 3D force field. We compared baseline performance before and after exposure to the novel field to quantify learning. In Experiment 1, the exposure phases (but not the baseline measures) were delivered under three different conditions: (i) robot haptic assistance; (ii) no guidance; (iii) robot haptic disturbance. The disturbance group showed the best learning as our model predicted. Experiment 2 further tested our FEP inspired model. Assistive and/or disturbance forces were applied as a function of performance (low surprise), and compared to a random error manipulation (high surprise). The random group showed the most improvement as predicted by the model. Thus, motor learning can be conceptualised as a process of entropy reduction. Short term motor strategies (e.g. global impedance) can mitigate unexpected perturbations, but continuous movements require active inference about external force-fields in order to create accurate internal models of the external world (motor learning). Our findings reconcile research on the relationship between noise, variability, and motor learning, and show that information is the currency of motor learning.
- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Field percentile
- top 36%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Indirect Haptic Disturbances Enhance Motor Variability, with Divergent Effects on Skill Transfer
Wouter Arink, Katherine L. Poggensee, … Laura Marchal–Crespo·IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob)Peer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2024
- Explicit strategies in force field adaptation
Raphael Schween, Samuel D. McDougle, … Jordan A. Taylor·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Mar 25, 2020
- High variability impairs motor learning regardless of whether it affects task performance
Marco Cardis, Maura Casadio, Rajiv Ranganathan·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 27, 2017
- Perceptual prediction error supports implicit process in motor learning.
Xiaoyue Zhang, Wencheng Wu, Kunlin Wei·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2026
- Interaction between Model-based and Model-free Mechanisms in Motor Learning
S Adith Deva Kumar, Adarsh Kumar, Neeraj Kumar·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Oct 14, 2025
- Instrumental-Motor Transfer: The Relative Value of Competing Movement Goals Modulates Implicit Motor Learning
Naser Al-Fawakhiri, Vikram S. Chib, Samuel D. McDougle·bioRxiv·Sep 24, 2026