Reciprocal cybrids reveal how organellar genomes affect plant phenotypes
Pádraic J. FloodiD, Tom P. J. M. TheeuweniD, Korbinian SchneebergeriD, Paul Keizer, Willem KruijeriD, Edouard I. SeveringiD, Evangelos Kouklas, Jos A. HagemaniD, Raúl Y. WijfjesiD, Vanesa Calvo‐BaltanásiD, Frank F. M. BeckeriD, Sabine K. Schnabel, Leo A. J. WillemsiD, Wilco LigterinkiD, Jeroen van ArkeliD, Roland MummiD, José M. GualbertoiD, Linda J. Savage, David KrameriD, Joost J. B. KeurentjesiD, Fred A. van EeuwijkiD, Maarten KoornneefiD, Jeremy HarbinsoniD, Mark G. M. AartsiD, T.G. WijnkeriD
Abstract
Assessing the impact of variation in chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA (collectively termed the plasmotype) on plant phenotypes is challenging due to the difficulty in separating their effect from nuclear derived variation (the nucleotype). Haploid inducer lines can be used as efficient plasmotype donors to generate new plasmotype-nucleotype combinations (cybrids)(Ravi et al., 2014). We generated a panel comprising all possible cybrids of seven Arabidopsis thaliana accessions and extensively phenotyped these lines for 1859 phenotypes under stable and fluctuating conditions. We show that natural variation in the plasmotype results in additive as well as epistatic effects across all phenotypic categories. Plasmotypes which induce more additive phenotypic changes also cause more significant epistatic effects, suggesting a possible common basis for both additive and epistatic effects. On average epistatic interactions explained twice as much of the variance in phenotypes as additive plasmotype effects. The impact of plasmotypic variation was also more pronounced under fluctuating and stressful environmental conditions. Thus, the phenotypic impact of variation in plasmotypes is the outcome of multilevel Nucleotype X Plasmotype X Environment interactions and, as such, the plasmotype is likely to serve as a reservoir of variation which is only exposed under certain conditions. The production of cybrids using haploid inducers is a quick and precise method for assessing the phenotypic effects of natural variation in organellar genomes. It will facilitate efficient screening of unique nucleotype-plasmotype combinations to both improve our understanding of natural variation in nucleotype plasmotype interactions and identify favourable combinations to improve plant performance.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 60
- FWCI
- 5.81
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Species wide inventory of Arabidopsis thaliana organellar variation reveals ample phenotypic variation for photosynthetic performance
Tom P. J. M. Theeuwen, Raúl Y. Wijfjes, … Mark G. M. Aarts·Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPeer-reviewed·Nov 27, 2024
- Plasmotype condition nuclear pleiotropic effects on clock and fitness in barley
E. Bdolach, M. R. Prusty, … E. Fridman·bioRxiv·Nov 2, 2021
- Cytoplasmic genomes change allelic expression bias in plant seeds independently of parental imprinting: evidence for cytonuclear regulatory epistasis in Arabidopsis thaliana
Pouya Motienoparvar, Linyi Lai, … Peter C. McKeown·bioRxiv·Oct 26, 2026
- Novel cytonuclear combinations modify Arabidopsis seed physiology and vigor
C. Boussardon, M.-L. Martin-Magniette, … F. Budar·bioRxiv·Jul 17, 2018
- The role of cytonuclear interactions to plant adaptation across a Populus hybrid zone
Michelle Zavala‐Paez, Brianna N. Sutara, … Jill A. Hamilton·Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2025
- Tissue culture as a source of replicates in non-model plants: variation in cold tolerance in Arabidopsis lyrata ssp. petraea
Tanaka Kenta, Jessica Edwards, … Matthew P. Davey·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2016