Reprogramming LCLs to iPSCs Results in Recovery of Donor-Specific Gene Expression Signature
Samantha M Thomas, Courtney Kagan, Bryan J Pavlovic, Jonathan Burnett, Kristen Patterson, Jonathan K Pritchard, Yoav GiladiD
Abstract
Renewable in vitro cell cultures, such as lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs), have facilitated studies that contributed to our understanding of genetic influence on human traits. However, the degree to which cell lines faithfully maintain differences in donor-specific phenotypes is still debated. We have previously reported that standard cell line maintenance practice results in a loss of donor-specific gene expression signatures in LCLs. An alternative to the LCL model is the induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) system, which carries the potential to model tissue-specific physiology through the use of differentiation protocols. Still, existing LCL banks represent an important source of starting material for iPSC generation, and it is possible that the disruptions in gene regulation associated with long-term LCL maintenance could persist through the reprogramming process. To address this concern, we studied the effect of reprogramming mature LCLs to iPSCs on the ensuing gene expression patterns within and between six unrelated donor individuals. We show that the reprogramming process results in a recovery of donor-specific gene regulatory signatures. Since environmental contributions are unlikely to be a source of individual variation in our system of highly passaged cultured cell lines, our observations suggest that the effect of genotype on gene regulation is more pronounced in the iPSCs than in the LCL precursors. Our findings indicate that iPSCs can be a powerful model system for studies of phenotypic variation across individuals in general, and the genetic association with variation in gene regulation in particular. We further conclude that LCLs are an appropriate starting material for iPSC generation.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Genetic Variation, Not Cell Type of Origin, Underlies Regulatory Differences in iPSCs
Courtney L Kagan, Nicholas E Banovich, … Yoav Gilad·PLOS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jan 26, 2016
- Reliable multiplex generation of pooled induced pluripotent stem cells for genetic testing
Molly Smullen, Meagan N. Olson, … Yingleong Chan·Cell Reports MethodsPeer-reviewed·Aug 31, 2023
- Common genetic variation drives molecular heterogeneity in human iPSCs
Helena Kilpinen, Angela Goncalves, … Daniel J Gaffney·bioRxiv·May 25, 2016
- A new NHGRI Sample Repository for Human Genetic Research collection of induced pluripotent stem cell lines.
Tatyana Pozner, Christine Grandizio, … Laura Scheinfeldt·bioRxiv·Aug 5, 2025
- Impact of regulatory variation across human iPSCs and differentiated cells
Nicholas E. Banovich, Yang Li, … Yoav Gilad·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2018
- Development of a Stable Human iPSC Line from Peripheral Blood: A Control Resource for Disease Modeling
Surajit Malakar, Vasanth Thamodaran, … Parimal Kumar Das·bioRxiv·Aug 21, 2025