Higher prevalence of sacbrood virus in highbush blueberry pollination units
Alison McAfeeiD, Sarah K. FrenchiD, Sydney B. WizenbergiD, Laura R. NewburniD, Nadejda TsvetkoviD, Heather A. HigoiD, Julia Common, Stephen F. PernaliD, Pierre GiovenazzoiD, Shelley E. HooveriD, Ernesto Guzmán‐NovoaiD, Robert W CurrieiD, Patricia Wolf VeigaiD, Ida M. Conflitti, Mateus PepinelliiD, Lan TraniD, Amro ZayediD, Maria Marta GuarnaiD, Leonard J. FosteriD
Abstract
Highbush blueberry pollination depends on managed honey bees (Apis mellifera) for adequate fruit set; however, beekeepers have raised concerns about poor health of colonies after pollinating this crop. Postulated causes include agrochemical exposure, nutritional deficits, and interactions with parasites and pathogens, particularly Melisococcus plutonius(the causal agent of European foulbrood disease), but other pathogens could be involved. To broadly investigate common honey bee pathogens in relation to blueberry pollination, we sampled adult honey bees from colonies at time points corresponding to before (t1), during (t2), at the end (t3), and after (t4) highbush blueberry pollination in British Columbia (BC), Canada, across two years (2020 and 2021). Nine viruses as well as M. plutonius, Vairimorpha ceranae and V. apis (formerly Nosema ceranae and N. apis) were detected by PCR and microscopy and compared among colonies located near and far from blueberry fields. We found a significant interactive effect of time and blueberry proximity on the multivariate pathogen community, mainly due to differences at t4 (corresponding to roughly six weeks after the beginning of the pollination period). Post-hoc comparisons of pathogens in near and far groups at t4 showed that detections of sacbrood virus (SBV), which was significantly higher in the exposed group, was the primary driver. The association of SBV with highbush blueberry pollination may be contributing to the health decline that beekeepers observe after pollinating this crop, likely in combination with other factors.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 14
- FWCI
- 3.96
- Field percentile
- top 6%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Honey bees, Apis mellifera, are important pollinators of the highbush blueberry variety Ventura despite the inability to sonicate
K. Martin, B. Anderson, … M. de Jager·bioRxiv·Feb 16, 2019
- Assessing the effectiveness of honey bee pollinators for cultivated blueberries in South Africa
K. Martin, B. Anderson, … C. Minnaar·bioRxiv·Sep 3, 2021
- Factors affecting virus prevalence in honey bees in the Pacific-Northwest, USA
V. W. Pfeiffer, D. W. Crowder·bioRxiv·Nov 19, 2021
- A quantitative survey of the blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) nectar microbiome: variation between cultivars, locations, and farm management approaches
C. Rering, A. Rudolph, … C. Hunter·bioRxiv·Sep 11, 2023
- Effects of a field-sprayed antibiotic on bee foraging behavior and pollination in pear orchards
L. Avila, C. McCullough, … B. J. Brosi·bioRxiv·Feb 14, 2023
- Honey bee (Apis mellifera) gut microbiome associations with viruses and pesticides across Canadian agroecosystems
A. D. Kozlova, Lan Tran, … Huan Zhong·bioRxiv·Jun 23, 2026