A structured evaluation and benchmarking of Boolean logical modelling tools
Benjamin SaalfeldiD, Emanuel LangeiD, Jacob KrügeriD, Petra LutteriD, Robert HeyeriD
Abstract
Biomolecules form complex interaction systems at different biological levels. The dynamics behind the interactions of biomolecules result in cellular phenotypes and responses. Two typical biological interaction systems are signal transduction and gene regulatory networks. Boolean models characterise these systems components with binary state variables and their interactions with rules governing their influence on each other, without requiring kinetic and abundance information about these components. Tools are available to define, analyse, and manage these models, but there is a lack of an overview and evaluation of such tools quality and functionality. This work aims to facilitate the selection of software tools for Boolean modelling of signal transduction and gene regulatory networks by developing benchmark and evaluation criteria and applying them to the available tools. Twenty Boolean modelling tools were identified, which were assessed on their compliance to ten FAIR4RS (Findability, Accessibility, Interoperability, and Reusability for Research Software) aspects. Additionally, usability was assessed using a set of 25 developed sub-criteria. Furthermore, the functionalities were analysed, validated and the tools abilities to simulate and analyse Boolean models of different sizes were benchmarked. The evaluation demonstrated that, whilst the results produced by the 20 tools were completely consistent, their analytical functionalities and capabilities to simulate larger models varied widely. Size constraints for tools functionalities ranged between 25 and more than 10,000 nodes. Each tool only covered part of the available functionalities, and many exhibited deficiencies in FAIR4RS compliance and usability. Based on our analysis, we see great potential for researchers to improve the usability of their tools along the FAIR4RS aspects in the future, with average tools in our evaluation not yet addressing 40% of the aspects (20% for the best-performing one). The aim is to present a useful overview of usability and functionality of Boolean modelling tools and to show how they can be improved throughout the entire community. Author summaryOur study provides a set of criteria and a benchmarking toolkit for evaluating FAIR4RS and usability aspects as well as functionalities of Boolean modelling tools. We establish an overview of a wide range of Boolean modelling tools for signal transduction and gene regulatory network modelling, which is intended to make it easier for users to choose software according to their needs. This work empowers developers by offering crucial assets: a standardised evaluation criteria set for comparing their tools functionalities, usability, and FAIR4RS compliance throughout the community. Our models and benchmarking assets further enable developers to precisely determine and improve their softwares model size limitations.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Repository of logically consistent real-world Boolean network models
Samuel Pastva, David Šafránek, … Thomas A. Henzinger·bioRxiv·Jun 12, 2023
- Critical assessment of the ability of Boolean threshold models to describe gene regulatory network dynamics.
Claus Kadelka, Kishore Hari·PNAS NexusPeer-reviewed·Jul 23, 2025
- Biologically meaningful regulatory logic enhances the convergence rate in Boolean networks and bushiness of their state transition graph
Priyotosh Sil, Ajay Subbaroyan, … Areejit Samal·Briefings in BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2024
- Minimum complexity drives regulatory logic in Boolean models of living systems
Ajay Subbaroyan, Olivier Martin, Areejit Samal·PNAS NexusPeer-reviewed·Mar 1, 2022
- Implementation of a Computing Pipeline for Evaluating the Extensibility of Boolean Networks' Structure and Function
Rémi Segretain, Sergiu Ivanov, … Nicolas Glade·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2020
- Why Boolean network control tools disagree: a taxonomy of control problems
Célia Biane, Kyungduk Moon, … Loïc Paulevé·bioRxiv·Mar 3, 2026