Sign in
BioinformaticsMolecular Systems Biology
Peer-reviewed journal article

State of the Interactomes: an evaluation of molecular networks for generating biological insights

Sarah N. WrightiD, Scott ColtoniD, Leah V. SchafferiD, Rudolf PillichiD, Christopher ChurasiD, Dexter R. PrattiD, Trey E. IdekeriD

Abstract

Advancements in genomic and proteomic technologies have powered the use of gene and protein networks ("interactomes") for understanding genotype-phenotype translation. However, the proliferation of interactomes complicates the selection of networks for specific applications. Here, we present a comprehensive evaluation of 46 current human interactomes, encompassing protein-protein interactions as well as gene regulatory, signaling, colocalization, and genetic interaction networks. Our analysis shows that large composite networks such as HumanNet, STRING, and FunCoup are most effective for identifying disease genes, while smaller networks such as DIP and SIGNOR demonstrate strong interaction prediction performance. These findings provide a benchmark for interactomes across diverse network biology applications and clarify factors that influence network performance. Furthermore, our evaluation pipeline paves the way for continued assessment of emerging and updated interaction networks in the future.

PDFDOI

02 /Specification & Classification

Click any tag to browse matching papers
Citations
32
FWCI
4.36
Field percentile
top 4%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISLi '16Basha '20Wang '21Krishnan '16Agrawal '17Guo '20
66% semantic matchGenomics
Taibo Li, Rasmus Wernersson, Rasmus Borup Hansen+10 more·Nature Methods·Nov 28, 2016