BioinformaticsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Differential network analysis of human tissue interactomes highlights tissue-selective processes and genetic disorder genes
Omer BashaiD, Chanan M ArgoviD, Raviv Artzy, Yazeed ZoabiiD, Idan HekselmaniD, Liad AlfandariiD, Vered Chalifa CaspiiD, Esti Yeger‐LotemiD
Abstract
MotivationDifferential network analysis, designed to highlight interaction changes between conditions, is an important paradigm in network biology. However, network analysis methods have been typically designed to compare between few conditions, were rarely applied to protein interaction networks (interactomes). Moreover, large-scale benchmarks for their evaluation have been lacking.\n\nResultsHere, we assess five network analysis methods by applying them to 34 human tissues interactomes. For this, we created a manually-curated benchmark of 6,499 tissue-specific, gene ontology biological processes, and analyzed the ability of each method to expose these tissue-process associations. The four differential network analysis methods outperformed the non-differential, expression-based method (AUCs of 0.82-0.9 versus 0.69, respectively). We then created another benchmark, of 1,527 tissue-specific disease cases, and analyzed the ability of differential network analysis methods to highlight additional disease-related genes. Compared to a non-differential subnetworks surrounding a known disease-causing gene, the extremely-differential subnetwork (top 1%) was significantly enriched for additional disease-causing genes in 18.6% of the cases (p[≤]10e-3). In 5/10 tissues tested, including Muscle, nerve and heart tissues (p = 2.54E-05, 2.71E-04, 3.63E-19), such enrichments were highly significant.\n\nSummaryAltogether, our study demonstrates that differential network analysis of human tissue interactomes is a powerful tool for highlighting processes and genes with tissue-selective functionality and clinical impact. Moreover, it offers expansive manually-curated datasets of tissue-selective processes and diseases that could serve for benchmark and for analyses in many other studies.\n\nContactestiyl@bgu.ac.il
- Citations
- 35
- FWCI
- 1.86
- Field percentile
- top 14%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- State of the Interactomes: an evaluation of molecular networks for generating biological insights
Sarah N. Wright, Scott Colton, … Trey E. Ideker·Molecular Systems BiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 9, 2024
- A convex optimization approach for identification of human tissue-specific interactomes
Shahin Mohammadi, Ananth Grama·bioRxiv·May 5, 2016
- JDINAC: joint density-based non-parametric differential interaction network analysis and classification using high-dimensional sparse omics data
Jiadong Ji, Di He, … Lei Xie·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2017
- DiCE: Differential Centrality-Ensemble Analysis Based on Gene Expression Profiles and Protein-Protein Interaction Network
Elnaz Pashaei, Sheng Liu, … Jun Wan·Nucleic Acids ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jun 13, 2025
- multiDEGGs: a multi-omic differential network analysis package for biomarker discovery and predictive modeling
Elisabetta Sciacca, Susan Siyu Wang, … Myles Lewis·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2025
- Differential Community Detection in Paired Biological Networks
Raghvendra Mall, Ehsan Ullah, … Michele Ceccarelli·ACM International Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology, and Health Informatics (ACM-BCB)Peer-reviewed·Aug 20, 2017