Human Genetics and Genomics AdvancesGenetic & Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed journal article
Viewing Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Test Results for Depression Risk Is Psychologically Well Tolerated: Evidence from a Longitudinal Equivalence Study
Rebecca M. K. Berns, Devika Dhamija, Daniella CokeriD, Chelsea L. RobertsoniD, Jingran Wen, Rebekah Ryanne WuiD, Michael Vaclav HolmesiD, Noura S. Abul‐HusniD
Abstract
BackgroundDepression is a frequent focus of interest in genetic testing. Despite growing availability of polygenic risk scores (PRS) for depression, little is known about the psychological impact of receiving them in real-world settings. To quantify the impact of receiving an at-risk depression PRS result on depression and anxiety symptoms, we conducted a longitudinal, prospective cohort study of 23andMe, Inc. research participants. MethodsSurveys were conducted between October 19, 2022 and October 9, 2023. Eligible participants were U.S. residents [≥] 18 years old who completed two surveys assessing depression and anxiety symptoms and had an at-risk PRS result for depression (odds ratio [≥] 1.5). We compared individuals who viewed their result to individuals who did not. Primary outcomes were changes in depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8) and anxiety (Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21) symptom scores relative to baseline. We fitted linear regressions to model each outcome, adjusting for age, sex, genetic ancestry, income, prior depression and anxiety, and baseline scores. Using an equivalence testing framework, the smallest effect size of interest was defined as Cohens d = {+/-}0.5. FindingsWe analyzed data from 917 participants, including 361 who viewed the depression PRS and 556 who did not. Score changes from baseline to follow-up were statistically equivalent for individuals who viewed PRS results and those who did not. The adjusted between-group differences in score changes were -0.17 points for depression (90% CI, -0.59-0.24, two one-side tests p < 0.001) and -0.092 points for anxiety (90% CI, -0.35-0.17, two one-side tests p < 0.001), both equivalent within the predefined margin. Results were consistent in substrata defined by presence or absence of prior depression or anxiety. InterpretationAmong genetically at-risk individuals, exposure to a depression PRS result was well-tolerated in a real-world setting. Funding23andMe, Inc.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 34th percentile
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Adult Patient Perspectives on Psychiatric Polygenic Risk Scores
Craig Waldence McFarland, Amanda R. Merner, … Gabriel Lázaro‐Muñoz·medRxiv·Sep 27, 2026
- The contribution of genetic risk to the comorbidity of depression and anxiety: a multi-site electronic health records study
Brandon J. Coombes, Isotta Landi, … Joanna M. Biernacka·medRxiv·Apr 11, 2022
- Novel polygenic risk score links depression-related cortical transcriptomic changes to brain morphology and symptom severity
Amy E. Miles, Fernanda C. Dos Santos, … Yuliya S. Nikolova·NeuropsychopharmacologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 29, 2021
- Short-term psychosocial outcomes following disclosure of glaucoma polygenic risk score (INSiGHT Study)
Giorgina Maxwell, Robert Allen, … Emmanuelle Souzeau·medRxiv·Jul 1, 2026
- A Qualitative Study Exploring the Consumer Experience of Receiving Self-Initiated Polygenic Risk Scores from a Third-Party Website
Kiara Lowes, Kennedy J. Borle, … Jehannine Austin·European Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Oct 4, 2022
- Polygenic risk scores for major depressive disorder and neuroticism as predictors of antidepressant response: meta-analysis of three treatment cohorts.
Joey Ward, Nicholas Graham, … Daniel J. Smıth·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Sep 21, 2018