Accurate inference in parametric models reshapes neuroscientific interpretation and improves data-driven discovery
Pratik SachdevaiD, Jesse A. LivezeyiD, Maximilian E. DoughertyiD, Bon-Mi GuiD, Joshua D. BerkeiD, Kristofer E. BouchardiD
Abstract
A central goal of systems neuroscience is to understand the relationships amongst constituent units in neural populations and their modulation by external factors using high-dimensional and stochastic neural recordings. Statistical models, particularly parametric models, play an instrumental role in accomplishing this goal, because their fitted parameters can provide insight into the underlying biological processes that generated the data. However, extracting conclusions from a parametric model requires that it is fit using an inference procedure capable of selecting the correct parameters and properly estimating their values. Traditional approaches to parameter inference have been shown to suffer from failures in both selection and estimation. Recent development of algorithms that ameliorate these deficiencies raises the question of whether past work relying on such inference procedures have produced inaccurate systems neuroscience models, thereby impairing their interpretation. Here, we used the Union of Intersections, a statistical inference framework capable of state-of-the-art selection and estimation performance, to fit functional coupling, encoding, and decoding models across a battery of neural datasets. We found that, compared to baseline procedures, UoI inferred models with increased sparsity, improved stability, and qualitatively different parameter distributions, while maintaining predictive performance across recording modality, brain region, and task. Specifically, we obtained highly sparse functional coupling networks with substantially different community structure, more parsimonious encoding models, and decoding models that rely on fewer single-units. Together, these results demonstrate that accurate parameter inference reshapes interpretation in diverse neuroscience contexts. The ubiquity of model-based data-driven discovery in biology suggests that analogous results would be seen in other fields.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Resolving Non-identifiability Mitigates Bias in Models of Neural Tuning and Functional Coupling
Pratik Sachdeva, Ji Hyun Bak, … Kristofer E. Bouchard·bioRxiv·Jul 11, 2023
- Inferring and validating mechanistic models of neural microcircuits based on spike-train data
Josef Ladenbauer, Sam McKenzie, … Srdjan Ostojic·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Oct 30, 2019
- Methods and considerations for estimating parameters in biophysically detailed neural models with simulation based inference
Nicholas M. Tolley, Pedro Luiz Coelho Rodrigues, … Stephanie R. Jones·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 26, 2024
- Efficient Inference on a Network of Spiking Neurons using Deep Learning
Nina Baldy, Martin Breyton, … Meysam Hashemi·bioRxiv·Jan 26, 2024
- Inferring the collective dynamics of neuronal populations from single-trial spike trains using mechanistic models
Christian Donner, Manfred Opper, Josef Ladenbauer·bioRxiv·Jun 14, 2019
- Model Based Inference of Large Scale Brain Networks with Approximate Bayesian Computation
Timothy O. West, Luc Berthouze A, … Vladimir Litvak A·bioRxiv·Aug 26, 2020