Controlling gene expression timing through gene regulatory architecture
Abstract
Gene networks typically involve the regulatory control of multiple genes with related function. This connectivity enables correlated control of the levels and timing of gene expression. Here we study how gene expression timing in the single-input module motif can be encoded in the regulatory DNA of a gene. Using stochastic simulations, we examine the role of binding affinity, TF regulatory function and network size in controlling the mean first-passage time to reach a fixed fraction of steady-state expression for both an auto-regulated TF gene and a target gene. We also examine how the variability in first-passage time depends on these factors. We find that both network size and binding affinity can dramatically speed up or slow down the response time of network genes, in some cases predicting more than a 100-fold change compared to that for a constitutive gene. Furthermore, these factors can also significantly impact the fidelity of this response. Importantly, these effects do not occur at "extremes" of network size or binding affinity, but rather in an intermediate window of either quantity. Author summaryRegulated genes are able to respond to stimuli in order to ramp up or down production of specific proteins. Although there is considerable focus on the magnitude (or fold-change) of the response and how that depends on the architectural details of the regulatory DNA, the dynamics, which dictates the response time of the gene, is another key feature of a gene that is encoded within the DNA. Unraveling the rules that dictate both the response time of a gene and the precision of that response encoded in the DNA poses a fundamental problem. In this manuscript, we systematically investigate how the response time of genes in auto-regulatory networks is controlled by the molecular details of the network. In particular, we find that network size and TF-binding affinity are key parameters that can slow, in the case of auto-activation, or speed up, in the case of auto-repression, the response time of not only the auto-regulated gene but also the genes that are controlled by the auto-regulated TF. In addition, we find that the precision of the response depends crucially on these characteristics.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 16
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Field percentile
- top 29%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Regulatory asymmetry in the negative single-input module network motif: Role of network size, growth rate and binding affinity
Md Zulfikar Ali, Vinuselvi Parisutham, … Robert C. Brewster·bioRxiv·Dec 5, 2019
- Control strategies for the timing of intracellular events
Mengfang Cao, Baohua Qiu, … Tianshou Zhou·Physical review. EPeer-reviewed·Dec 2, 2019
- Dissection of the contribution of regulation mode to the properties of feedforward and feedback gene regulatory motifs.
Bharat Ravi Iyengar, Beena Pillai, … Chetan J. Gadgil·bioRxiv·Nov 30, 2016
- Precision of Tissue Patterning is Controlled by Dynamical Properties of Gene Regulatory Networks
Katherine Exelby, Edgar Herrera-Delgado, … James Briscoe·DevelopmentPeer-reviewed·Feb 5, 2021
- Short residence times of DNA-bound transcription factors can reduce gene expression noise and increase the transmission of information in a gene regulation system
Eugenio M. Azpeitia, Andreas Wagner·Frontiers in Molecular BiosciencesPeer-reviewed·Apr 28, 2020
- Maintaining gene expression levels by positive feedback in burst size in the presence of infinitesimal delay
Pavol Bokes·Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - BPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2019