Population genomic SNPs from epigenetic RADs: gaining genetic and epigenetic data from a single established next-generation sequencing approach
Abstract
O_LIEpigenetics is increasingly recognised as an important molecular mechanism underlying phenotypic variation. To study DNA methylation in ecological and evolutionary contexts, epiRADseq is a cost-effective next-generation sequencing technique based on reduced representation sequencing of genomic regions surrounding non-/methylated sites. EpiRADseq for genome-wide methylation abundance and ddRADseq for genome-wide SNP genotyping follow very similar library and sequencing protocols, but to date these two types of dataset have been handled separately. Here we test the performance of using epiRADseq data to generate SNPs for population genomic analyses.\nC_LIO_LIWe tested the robustness of using epiRADseq data for population genomics with two independent datasets: a newly generated single-end dataset for the European whitefish Coregonus lavaretus, and a re-analysis of publicly available, previously published paired-end data on corals. Using standard bioinformatic pipelines with a reference genome and without (i.e. de novo catalogue loci), we compared the number of SNPs retained, population genetic summary statistics, and population genetic structure between data drawn from ddRADseq and epiRADseq library preparations.\nC_LIO_LIWe find that SNPs drawn from epiRADseq are similar in number to those drawn from ddRADseq, with a 55-83% of SNPs being identified by both methods. Genotyping error rate was 0.88). Furthermore, identical patterns of population genetic structure were recovered using SNPs from epiRADseq and ddRADseq approaches.\nC_LIO_LIWe show that SNPs obtained from epiRADseq are highly similar to those from ddRADseq and are equivalent for estimating genetic diversity and population structure. This finding is particularly relevant to researchers interested in genetics and epigenetics on the same individuals because using a single epigenomic approach to generate two datasets greatly reduces the time and financial costs compared to using these techniques separately. It also efficiently enables correction of epigenetic estimates with population genetic data. Many studies will benefit from a combinatorial approach with genetic and epigenetic markers and this demonstrates a single, efficient method to do so.\nC_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 12
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Field percentile
- top 22%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Reference genome choice impacts SNP recovery but not evolutionary inference in young species
Luana Sousa Soares, Leonardo Tresoldi Gonçalves, … Loreta B. Freitas·bioRxiv·Feb 6, 2026
- Innovations in double digest restriction-site associated DNA sequencing (ddRAD-Seq) method for more efficient SNP identification
Zenaida V. Magbanua, Chuan-Yu Hsu, … Daniel G. Peterson·Analytical BiochemistryPeer-reviewed·Dec 5, 2022
- Genome-wide methylation data mirror ancestry information
Elior Rahmani, Liat Shenhav, … Eran Halperin·Epigenetics & ChromatinPeer-reviewed·Jan 3, 2017
- Accurate estimation of SNP genotypes and genetic relatedness from DNA methylation data
Yi Wei Jiang, Minghan Qu, … Chaolong Wang·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2024
- Estimating and accounting for genotyping errors in RAD-seq experiments
L. Bresadola, V. Link, … D. Wegmann·bioRxiv·Feb 21, 2020
- Improved inference of population histories by integrating genomic and epigenomic data
T. P. P. Sellinger, F. Johannes, A. Tellier·bioRxiv·Apr 2, 2023