Two conserved vocal central pattern generators broadly tuned for fast and slow rates generate species-specific vocalizations in Xenopus clawed frogs
Abstract
Across phyla, species-specific vocalizations are used by males to attract females. Functional analyses of the neural circuitry underlying behavior have been difficult, particularly in vertebrates. However, using an ex vivo brain preparation that produces fictive vocalizations, we previously identified anatomically distinct fast and slow central pattern generators (CPGs) that drive the fast and slow clicks of male courtship calls in male African clawed frogs, Xenopus laevis. To gain insight into the evolution of neural circuits underlying courtship calls, we extended this approach to four additional species. Here, we show that although the exact rate and duration of the clicks are unique to each species, fast and slow CPGs identified in male X. laevis are conserved across species. Further, we show that the development of fast CPGs depends on testosterone in a species-specific manner: testosterone facilitates the development of fast CPGs in a species with a courtship call containing fast clicks, but not in a species with a courtship call made entirely of slow clicks. Finally, we showed that, unlike other vestigial neural circuits that remain latent, the fast CPGs are not inherited by all species; rather, they are possessed only by the species that produce fast clicks. The results suggest that species-specific calls of the genus Xenopus have evolved by utilizing conserved fast or slow CPGs that are broadly tuned to generate fast or slow trains of clicks, the development of which appear to be regulated by a strategic expression of testosterone receptors in the brain of each species.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 1.96
- Field percentile
- top 14%
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Molecular Characterization of Parabrachial Neurons in Xenopus laevis and Silurana tropicalis: Evolutionary Conservation and Sex-Specific Differences
Adara DeNiro, Shrinivasan Raghuraman, … Ayako Yamaguchi·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 13, 2026
- Transcriptomic profiling reveals neurophysiological gene candidates underlying vocal evolution in African clawed frogs
Charlotte L. Barkan, Lucas A. Binder, … Erik Zornik·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 22, 2026
- The return to water in ancestral Xenopus was accompanied by a novel mechanisms for producing and shaping vocal signals
U. Kwong-Brown, M. L. Tobias, … D. B. Kelley·bioRxiv·Jul 3, 2018
- Two pup vocalization types are genetically and functionally separable in deer mice
N. Jourjine, M. L. Woolfolk, … H. E. Hoekstra·bioRxiv·Nov 11, 2022
- Environmental and morphological constraints interact to drive the evolution of communication signals in frogs
M. I. Munoz, S. Goutte, … W. Halfwerk·bioRxiv·Apr 18, 2020
- Parametric modulation of a shared midbrain circuit drives distinct vocal modes in a singing mouse
Xiaoyue Mike Zheng, Clifford E. Harpole, … Arkarup Bandyopadhyay·Current BiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 17, 2025