A qualitative exploration of eyecare professional perspectives on Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) care
I. Jalbert, D. Rahardjo, A. Yashadhana, G. Liew, B. Gopinath
Abstract
Despite the existence of evidence-based recommendations to decrease risk and progression of Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD) for some time, self-reported practices suggest that eyecare professionals advice and people with AMDs adherence to these recommendations can be very poor. This study uses qualitative methods to explore Australian eyecare professionals perspective on barriers to effective AMD care. Seven focus groups involving 65 optometrists were conducted by an experienced facilitator. A nominal group technique was used to identify, prioritize and semi-quantify barriers and enablers to AMD care. Participants individually ranked their perceived top five barriers and enablers with the most important granted a score of 5 and the least important a score of 1. For each barrier or enabler, the number of votes it received and its total score were recorded. Barriers and enablers selected by at least one participant in their top 5 were then qualitatively analysed, grouped using thematic analysis and total score calculated for each consolidated barrier or enabler. In-depth individual interviews were conducted with 10 ophthalmologists and 2 optometrists. Contributions were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed with NVivo software. One hundred and sixty-nine barriers and 51 enablers to AMD care were identified in the focus groups. Of these, 102 barriers and 42 enablers were selected as one of their top 5 by at least one participant and further consolidated into 16 barriers and 10 enablers after thematic analysis. Factors impacting AMD care identified through analysis of the transcripts were coded to three categories of influence: patient-centered, practitioner-centered, and structural factors. Eyecare professionals considered poor care pathways, people with AMDs poor disease understanding / denial, and cost of care / lack of funding, as the most significant barriers to AMD care; they considered shared care model, access, and communication as the most significant enablers to good AMD care. These findings suggest that Australian eyecare professionals perceive that there is a need for improved patient support systems and appropriately funded, clearer care pathway to benefit people with AMD.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Differences in Characteristics of Medicare Patients Treated by Ophthalmologists and Optometrists
Darby D. Miller, Michael W. Stewart, … Aaron Lee·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Sep 14, 2020
- Cell Stiffening Contributes to Complement-mediated Injury of Choroidal Endothelial Cells in Early AMD
A. P. Cabrera, J. Stoddard, … K. Ghosh·bioRxiv·Oct 6, 2021
- Age-related Macular Degeneration is associated with faster rates of structural brain changes and widespread differences in connectivity
Jacques Andrew Stout, Rui Dai, … Alexandra Badea·bioRxiv·Jul 19, 2022
- Attenuated adenosine mediated immune-dampening increases natural killer cell activity in early age-related macular degeneration
Archana Padmanabhan Nair, Sayan Ghosh, … Arkasubhra Ghosh·bioRxiv·Jan 22, 2025
- Association of Macular Pigment Density with Plasma Macular Carotenoids levels, And lipids in Indian patients with early Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Srinivasan Senthilkumari, Anand Rajendren, … Mohammed Sithiq Uduman·European Journal of OphthalmologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 19, 2024
- Patterns of gene expression and allele-specific expression vary among macular tissues and clinical stages of Age-related Macular Degeneration
Treefa Shwani, Charles Zhang, … Margaret M. DeAngelis·CellsPeer-reviewed·Nov 21, 2023