BMC GenomicsBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Fine-Tuning GBS Data with Comparison of Reference and Mock Genome Approaches for Advancing Genomic Selection in Less Studied Farmed Species
Daniel FischeriD, Miika TapioiD, Oliver BitziD, Terhi Iso‐TouruiD, Antti KauseiD, Ilma TapioiD
Abstract
BackgroundDiversifying animal cultivation demands efficient genotyping for enabling genomic selection, but non-model species lack efficient genotyping solutions. The aim of this study was to optimize a genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) double-digest RAD-sequencing (ddRAD) pipeline. Bovine data was used to automate the bioinformatic analysis. The application of the optimization was demonstrated on non-model European whitefish data. ResultsDdRAD data generation was designed for a reliable estimation of relatedness and is scalable to up to 384 samples. The GBS sequencing yielded approximately one million reads for each of the around 100 assessed samples. Optimizing various strategies to create a de-novo reference genome for variant calling (mock reference) showed that using three samples outperformed other building strategies with single or very large number of samples. Adjustments to most pipeline tuning parameters had limited impact on high-quality data, except for the identity criterion for merging mock reference genome clusters. For each species, over 15k GBS variants based on the mock reference were obtained and showed comparable results with the ones called using an existing reference genome. Repeatability analysis showed high concordance over replicates, particularly in bovine while in European whitefish data repeatability did not exceed earlier observations. ConclusionsThe proposed cost-effective ddRAD strategy, coupled with an efficient bioinformatics workflow, enables broad adoption of ddRAD GBS across diverse farmed species. While beneficial, a reference genome is not obligatory. The integration of Snakemake streamlines the pipeline usage on computer clusters and supports customization. This user-friendly solution facilitates genotyping for both model and non-model species.
- Citations
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Field percentile
- top 19%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Robust and efficient software for reference-free genomic diversity analysis of GBS data on diploid and polyploid species
Andrea Parra‐Salazar, Jorge M. Gómez, … Jorge Duitama·Molecular Ecology ResourcesPeer-reviewed·Jul 20, 2021
- Adapting genotyping-by-sequencing and variant calling for heterogeneous stock rats
Alexander F. Gileta, Jianjun Gao, … Abraham A. Palmer·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 12, 2020
- Variant calling and genotyping accuracy of ddRAD-seq: comparison with 20X WGS in layers
Mathilde Doublet, Fabien Degalez, … Frédéric Lecerf·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jul 26, 2024
- GBStools: A Unified Approach for Reduced Representation Sequencing and Genotyping
Thomas F Cooke, Muh-Ching Yee, … Eimear Kenny·PLOS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 1, 2016
- Evaluating genotyping strategies for a small managed population with simulation
Audrey AA Martin, Jeffrey J. Schoenebeck, … Gregor Gorjanc·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2025
- Genomic selection for any dairy breeding program via optimized investment in phenotyping and genotyping
Jana Obšteter, Janez Jenko, Gregor Gorjanc·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Feb 10, 2021