Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and ExhibitionBioengineeringPeer-reviewed journal article
ProFit-1D for quantifying J-difference edited data at 3T
Kimberly ChaniD, Tamás BorbáthiD, Sydney Sherlock, Elizabeth Anne MaheriD, Toral PateliD, A HenningiD
Abstract
Reproducible and accurate fitting of the magnetic resonance spectrum is critical for estimating metabolite concentrations. We have previously developed a fitting software called ProFit-1D which was shown to fit 9.4T semi-LASER data from the human brain with high accuracy and precision. In this study, we adapted ProFit-1D to fit J-difference edited spectra acquired at a clinical field strength of 3T and to assessed its performance in simulated and in vivo data. ProFit-1D was adapted to fit J-difference edited data with alterations to the fitting range to exclude the 1.3 ppm lipid resonance, starting T2 relaxation constants, initial fit parameters, and adaptive spectral baseline determination. The accuracy of ProFit-1D was systematically evaluated on simulated GABA-edited and 2-hydroxyglutarate-edited (2HG-edited) data with different types of in vivo parameter variations and compared to that of LCModel and Gannet, two software commonly used to fit J-difference edited data. The precision of ProFit-1D was also evaluated in GABA-edited spectra acquired in vivo in the occipital cortex (OCC) and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) of healthy participants at 3T using subsets of averages and compared to that of LCModel and Gannet. The 2HG fit error was also evaluated for ProFit-1D in 2HG-edited spectra acquired in glioma patients and compared to that of LCModel. Overall, it was found that ProFit-1D generally produced fits with low parameter fit errors across a variety of parameter variations. GABA, glutamate plus glutamine (Glx), and 2HG levels were also more accurately estimated with ProFit-1D than with LCModel and Gannet across different spectral disturbances and simulated concentrations. ProFit-1D was found to be as precise as LCModel and more precise than Gannet in estimating GABA and Glx. 2HG fit errors were 45% lower with ProFit-1D than with LCModel. Thus, ProFit-1D was found to produce high-quality fits to J- difference edited data with high accuracy and precision.
- organism: human
- assay: multiome
- assay: metabolomics
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: variant effect prediction
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: deep learning
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Field percentile
- top 14%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Participant-specific macromolecule information improves quantification of GABA-edited spectra at 3T
Justin R. Singer, Kimberly L. Chan·bioRxiv·Oct 14, 2026
- Linewidth-related bias in modelled concentration estimates from GABA-edited 1H-MRS
Alexander R. Craven, Tiffany Bell, … Georg Oeltzschner·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2024
- Importance of linear combination modeling for quantification of Glutathione and GABA levels using Hadamard-edited MRS
Y. Song, H. J. Zollner, … R. A. E. Edden·bioRxiv·Dec 28, 2021
- Comparison of seven modelling algorithms for GABA-edited 1H-MRS
Alexander R. Craven, Pallab K. Bhattacharyya, … Georg Oeltzschner·NMR in BiomedicinePeer-reviewed·Jan 25, 2022
- Comparison of linear combination modeling strategies for GABA-edited MRS at 3T
H. J. Zöllner, S. Tapper, … G. Oeltzschner·bioRxiv·May 26, 2021
- Impact of acquisition and modeling parameters on test-retest reproducibility of edited GABA+
Kathleen E. Hupfeld, Helge J. Zöllner, … Richard A.E. Edden·NMR in BiomedicinePeer-reviewed·Dec 13, 2023