Population modeling with machine learning can enhance measures of mental health
Kamalaker DadiiD, Gael P. VaroquauxiD, Josselin HouenouiD, Danilo BzdokiD, Bertrand ThirioniD, Denis Alexander EngemanniD
Abstract
BackgroundBiological aging is revealed by physical measures, e.g., DNA probes or brain scans. Instead, individual differences in mental function are explained by psychological constructs, e.g., intelligence or neuroticism. These constructs are typically assessed by tailored neuropsychological tests that build on expert judgement and require careful interpretation. Could machine learning on large samples from the general population be used to build proxy measures of these constructs that do not require human intervention? ResultsHere, we built proxy measures by applying machine learning on multimodal MR images and rich sociodemographic information from the largest biomedical cohort to date: the UK Biobank. Objective model comparisons revealed that all proxies captured the target constructs and were as useful, and sometimes more useful than the original measures for characterizing real-world health behavior (sleep, exercise, tobacco, alcohol consumption). We observed this complementarity of proxy measures and original measures when modeling from brain signals or sociodemographic data, capturing multiple health-related constructs. ConclusionsPopulation modeling with machine learning can derive measures of mental health from brain signals and questionnaire data, which may complement or even substitute for psychometric assessments in clinical populations. Key PointsO_LIWe applied machine learning on more than 10.000 individuals from the general population to define empirical approximations of health-related psychological measures that do not require human judgment. C_LIO_LIWe found that machine-learning enriched the given psychological measures via approximation from brain and sociodemographic data: Resulting proxy measures related as well or better to real-world health behavior than the original measures. C_LIO_LIModel comparisons showed that sociodemographic information contributed most to characterizing psychological traits beyond aging. C_LI
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 49
- FWCI
- 5.73
- Field percentile
- top 3%
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Biological age and brain age in midlife: relationship to multimorbidity and mental health
Fengqing Zhang, Hansoo Chang, … Jiangtao Gou·Neurobiology of AgingPeer-reviewed·Sep 11, 2023
- Brain-predicted age difference score is related to specific cognitive functions: A multi-site replication analysis
Rory Thomas Boyle, Lee Jollans, … Robert Whelan·Brain Imaging and BehaviorPeer-reviewed·Mar 5, 2020
- Multimodal brain-age prediction and cardiovascular risk: The Whitehall II MRI sub-study
Ann‐Marie G. de Lange, Melis Anatürk, … Klaus P. Ebmeier·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Aug 21, 2020
- A reusable benchmark of brain-age prediction from M/EEG resting-state signals
Denis Alexander Engemann, Apolline Mellot, … Alexandre Gramfort·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Jul 26, 2022
- Mental health explains individual deviations from normative range in cognition-associated brain states
Wei Zhang, Diego Vidaurre, Janine Diane Bijsterbosch·bioRxiv·Mar 12, 2021
- BrainAGE: Revisited and reframed machine learning workflow
Polona Kalc, Robert Dahnke, … Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·Human Brain MappingPeer-reviewed·Feb 15, 2024