TIGAR: An Improved Bayesian Tool for Transcriptomic Data Imputation Enhances Gene Mapping of Complex Traits
Sini NagpaliD, Xiaoran Meng, Michael P. EpsteiniD, Lam C. TsoiiD, Matthew T. PatrickiD, Greg C. GibsoniD, Philip L. De JageriD, David Alan BennettiD, Aliza P. WingoiD, Thomas S. WingoiD, Jingjing YangiD
Abstract
The transcriptome-wide association studies (TWAS) that test for association between the study trait and the imputed gene expression levels from cis-acting expression quantitative trait loci (cis-eQTL) genotypes have successfully enhanced the discovery of genetic risk loci for complex traits. By using the gene expression imputation models fitted from reference datasets that have both genetic and transcriptomic data, TWAS facilitates gene-based tests with GWAS data while accounting for the reference transcriptomic data. The existing TWAS tools like PrediXcan and FUSION use parametric imputation models that have limitations for modeling the complex genetic architecture of transcriptomic data. Therefore, we propose an improved Bayesian method that assumes a data-driven nonparametric prior to impute gene expression. Our method is general and flexible and includes both the parametric imputation models used by PrediXcan and FUSION as special cases. Our simulation studies showed that the nonparametric Bayesian model improved both imputation R2 for transcriptomic data and the TWAS power over PrediXcan. In real applications, our nonparametric Bayesian method fitted transcriptomic imputation models for 2X number of genes with 1.7X average regression R2 over PrediXcan, thus improving the power of follow-up TWAS. Hence, the nonparametric Bayesian model is preferred for modeling the complex genetic architecture of transcriptomes and is expected to enhance transcriptome-integrated genetic association studies. We implement our Bayesian approach in a convenient software tool \"TIGAR\" (Transcriptome-Integrated Genetic Association Resource), which imputes transcriptomic data and performs subsequent TWAS using individual-level or summary-level GWAS data.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 140
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Field percentile
- top 2%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- A unified hierarchical Bayesian approach to transcriptome-wide association study
Arnab Kumar Khan, Subashani Singh, … Arunabha Majumdar·bioRxiv·Sep 12, 2024
- Modeling prediction error improves power of transcriptome-wide association studies
Kunal Bhutani, Abhishek Sarkar, … Nicholas J. Schork·bioRxiv·Feb 14, 2017
- TIGAR-V2: Efficient TWAS Tool with Nonparametric Bayesian eQTL Weights of 49 Tissue Types from GTEx V8
Randy L. Parrish, Greg C. Gibson, … Jingjing Yang·Human Genetics and Genomics AdvancesPeer-reviewed·Nov 3, 2021
- A-TWAS: An aggregated transcriptome-wide association study model incorporating multiple Bayesian priors
Yilan Liang, Han Wang, Yan Zhang·bioRxiv·Jan 27, 2025
- Prediction of gene expression from regulatory sequence composition enhances transcriptome-wide association studies
Federico Marotta, Reza Mozafari, … Paolo Provero·bioRxiv·May 11, 2021
- Some Statistical Consideration in Transcriptome-Wide Association Studies
Haoran Xue, Wei Pan, Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative·Genetic EpidemiologyPeer-reviewed·Dec 10, 2019