henhaobio
Sign in

BiomaterialsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

3D electronic implants in subretinal space: long-term follow-up in rodents

Mohajeet B. BhuckoryiD, Bing-Yi WangiD, Zhijie CheniD, Andrew ShiniD, Davis Pham-HowardiD, Sarthak Vinay ShahiD, Nicharee MonkongpitukkuliD, Ludwig Galambos, Theodore I KaminsiD, Keith MathiesoniD, Daniel PalankeriD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

Photovoltaic subretinal prosthesis (PRIMA) enables restoration of sight via electrical stimulation of the interneurons in degenerated retina, with resolution limited by the 100 m pixel size. Since decreasing the pixel size below 75 m in the current bipolar geometry is impossible, we explore the possibility of using smaller pixels based on a novel 3-dimensional honeycomb-shaped design. We assessed the long-term biocompatibility and stability of these arrays in rats by investigating the anatomical integration of the retina with flat and 3D implants and response to electrical stimulation over lifetime - up to 9 months post-implantation in aged rats. With both flat and 3D implants, VEP amplitude decreased after the day of implantation by more than 3-fold, and gradually recovered over about 3 months. With 25 m high honeycomb walls, the majority of bipolar cells migrate into the wells, while amacrine and ganglion cells remain above the cavities, which is essential for selective network-mediated stimulation of the second-order neurons. Retinal thickness and full-field stimulation threshold with 40 m-wide honeycomb pixels were comparable to those with planar devices - 0.05 mW/mm2 with 10ms pulses. However, fewer cells from the inner nuclear layer migrated into the 20 m-wide wells, and stimulation threshold increased over 5 months, before stabilizing at about 0.08 mW/mm2. Such threshold is significantly lower than 1.8 mW/mm2 with a previous design of flat bipolar pixels, confirming the promise of the 3D honeycomb-based approach to high resolution subretinal prosthesis.

Citations
7
FWCI
0.85
Field percentile
top 31%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISButt '24Bhuckory '22Jensen '26Wang '22Chen '22Ly '26
88% semantic matchNeuroscience
Emma Butt, Bing-Yi Wang, Andrew Shin+7 more·Journal of Neural Engineering·Feb 1, 2024· 9 citations