Nature CommunicationsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Assessment of Polygenic Architecture and Risk Prediction based on Common Variants Across Fourteen Cancers
Yan ZhangiD, Amber N. HursoniD, Haoyu ZhangiD, Parichoy Pal ChoudhuryiD, Douglas F. EastoniD, Roger Laughlin MilneiD, Jacques SimardiD, Per N HalliD, Kyriaki MichailidouiD, Joe DennisiD, Marjanka K. SchmidtiD, Jenny C. Chang-ClaudeiD, Puya GharahkhaniiD, David C. WhitemaniD, Peter T. CampbelliD, Michael HoffmeisteriD, Mark JenkinsiD, Ulrike PetersiD, Li HsuiD, Stephen B. GruberiD, Graham CaseyiD, Stephanie L. SchmitiD, Tracy A. O’MaraiD, Amanda B. SpurdleiD, Deborah J. ThompsoniD, , Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR)
Abstract
We analyzed summary-level data from genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of European ancestry across fourteen cancer sites to estimate the number of common susceptibility variants (polygenicity) contributing to risk, as well as the distribution of their associated effect sizes. All cancers evaluated showed polygenicity, involving at a minimum thousands of independent susceptibility variants. For some malignancies, particularly chronic lymphoid leukemia (CLL) and testicular cancer, there are a larger proportion of variants with larger effect sizes than those for other cancers. In contrast, most variants for lung and breast cancers have very small associated effect sizes. For different cancer sites, we estimate a wide range of GWAS sample sizes, required to explain 80% of GWAS heritability, varying from 60,000 cases for CLL to over 1,000,000 cases for lung cancer. The maximum relative risk achievable for subjects at the 99th risk percentile of underlying polygenic risk scores, compared to average risk, ranges from 12 for testicular to 2.5 for ovarian cancer. We show that polygenic risk scores have substantial potential for risk stratification for relatively common cancers such as breast, prostate and colon, but limited potential for other cancer sites because of modest heritability and lower disease incidence.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: polygenic risk
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 137
- FWCI
- 12.00
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Deciphering the Genomic architecture of three major Cancers in African-Ancestry Populations
David Enoma, Anthony Micheal Idedia, … Olubanke Olujoke Ogunlana·medRxiv·Dec 22, 2025
- Polygenic risk scores for the prediction of common cancers in East Asians: A population-based prospective cohort study
Peh Joo Ho, Iain Beehuat Tan, … Jingmei Li·eLifePeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2023
- Cross-Cancer Evaluation of Polygenic Risk Scores for 17 Cancer Types in Two Large Cohorts
Rebecca E. Graff, Taylor B. Cavazos, … Lori C. Sakoda·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Feb 12, 2021
- Genetic assessments of breast cancer risk that do not account for polygenic background are incomplete and lead to incorrect preventative strategies
George Busby, Paul Craig, … Giordano Bottà·medRxiv·Aug 13, 2021
- Association of Polygenic Risk Scores for Multiple Cancers in a Phenome-wide Study: Results from The Michigan Genomics Initiative
Lars G. Fritsche, Stephen B. Gruber, … Bhramar Mukherjee·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 17, 2018
- Pan-Cancer Study Detects Novel Genetic Risk Variants and Shared Genetic Basis in Two Large Cohorts
Sara R. Rashkin, Rebecca E. Graff, … John S. Witte·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Sep 4, 2020