Nature CommunicationsGeneticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Cross-Cancer Evaluation of Polygenic Risk Scores for 17 Cancer Types in Two Large Cohorts
Rebecca E. GraffiD, Taylor B. CavazosiD, Khanh K. ThaiiD, Linda KachuriiD, Sara R. RashkiniD, Joshua HoffmaniD, Stacey AlexeeffiD, Maruta A. BlatchinsiD, Travis J. MeyersiD, Lancelote LeongiD, Caroline Gar-Ling TaiiD, Nima C. EmamiiD, Douglas A. CorleyiD, Lawrence H. KushiiD, Elad ZiviD, Stephen K. Van Den EedeniD, Eric JorgensoniD, Thomas J. HoffmanniD, Laurel A. HabeliD, John S. WitteiD, Lori C. SakodaiD
Abstract
Genetic factors that influence etiologic mechanisms shared across cancers could affect the risk of multiple cancer types. We investigated polygenic risk score (PRS)-specific pleiotropy across 17 cancers in two large population-based cohorts. The study population included European ancestry individuals from the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging cohort (16,012 cases, 50,552 controls) and the UK Biobank (48,969 cases, 359,802 controls). We selected known independent risk variants from published GWAS to construct a PRS for each cancer type. Within cohorts, each PRS was evaluated in multivariable logistic regression models with respect to the cancer for which it was developed and each other cancer type. Results were then meta-analyzed across cohorts. In the UK Biobank, each PRS was additionally evaluated relative to 20 cancer risk factors or biomarkers. All PRS replicated associations with their corresponding cancers (p<0.05). Eleven cross-cancer associations - ten positive and one inverse - were found after correction for multiple testing (p<0.05/17=0.0029). Two cancer pairs showed bidirectional associations; the melanoma PRS was positively associated with oral cavity/pharyngeal cancer and vice versa, whereas the lung cancer PRS was positively associated with oral cavity/pharyngeal cancer, and the oral cavity/pharyngeal cancer PRS was inversely associated with lung cancer. We identified 65 associations between a cancer PRS and non-cancer phenotype. In this study examining cross-cancer PRS associations in two cohorts unselected for phenotype, we validated known and uncovered novel patterns of pleiotropy. Our results have the potential to inform investigations of risk prediction, shared etiology, and precision cancer prevention strategies. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCEBy examining cross-cancer polygenic risk score associations, we validated known and uncovered novel patterns of pleiotropy. Our results may inform investigations of risk prediction, shared etiology, and precision prevention strategies.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 113
- FWCI
- 11.86
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Cross-ancestry and phenome-wide associations of cancer-specific polygenic risk scores
Louise L. Wang, Heena Desai, … Henry R. Kranzler·JCO Precision OncologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2026
- Polygenic risk scores for the prediction of common cancers in East Asians: A population-based prospective cohort study
Peh Joo Ho, Iain Beehuat Tan, … Jingmei Li·eLifePeer-reviewed·Mar 27, 2023
- On Cross-ancestry Cancer Polygenic Risk Scores
Lars G. Fritsche, Ying Ma, … Bhramar Mukherjee·PLoS GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2021
- Association of Polygenic Risk Scores for Multiple Cancers in a Phenome-wide Study: Results from The Michigan Genomics Initiative
Lars G. Fritsche, Stephen B. Gruber, … Bhramar Mukherjee·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 17, 2018
- Pan-cancer analysis demonstrates that integrating polygenic risk scores with modifiable risk factors improves risk prediction
Linda Kachuri, Rebecca E. Graff, … Mattias Johansson·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Nov 27, 2020
- Cancer Diagnosis, Polygenic Risk, and Longevity-Associated Variants.
Laura H. Goetz, Janith Don, … Nicholas J. Schork·medRxiv·Sep 18, 2020