Nature CommunicationsGenomicsPeer-reviewed journal article
A Comprehensive Assessment of Somatic Mutation Calling in Cancer Genomes
Tyler S Alioto, Sophia Derdak, Timothy A Beck, Paul C Boutros, Lawrence Bower, Ivo BuchhalteriD, Matthew D Eldridge, Nicholas J Harding, Lawrence Edward Heisler, Eivind Hovig, David T W Jones, Andrew G Lynch, Sigve NakkeniD, Paolo RibecaiD, Anne-Sophie Sertier, Jared T Simpson, Paul Spellman, Patrick Tarpey, Laurie Tonon, Daniel VodákiD, Takafumi N Yamaguchi, Sergi Beltran Agullo, Marc DabadiD, Robert E Denroche, Philip Ginsbach, , Rolf Kab
Abstract
The emergence of next generation DNA sequencing technology is enabling high-resolution cancer genome analysis. Large-scale projects like the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) are systematically scanning cancer genomes to identify recurrent somatic mutations. Second generation DNA sequencing, however, is still an evolving technology and procedures, both experimental and analytical, are constantly changing. Thus the research community is still defining a set of best practices for cancer genome data analysis, with no single protocol emerging to fulfil this role. Here we describe an extensive benchmark exercise to identify and resolve issues of somatic mutation calling. Whole genome sequence datasets comprising tumor-normal pairs from two different types of cancer, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and medulloblastoma, were shared within the ICGC and submissions of somatic mutation calls were compared to verified mutations and to each other. Varying strategies to call mutations, incomplete awareness of sources of artefacts, and even lack of agreement on what constitutes an artefact or real mutation manifested in widely varying mutation call rates and somewhat low concordance among submissions. We conclude that somatic mutation calling remains an unsolved problem. However, we have identified many issues that are easy to remedy that are presented here. Our study highlights critical issues that need to be addressed before this valuable technology can be routinely used to inform clinical decision-making.\n\nAbbreviations and Definitionsaligner = mapper, these terms are used interchangeably
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Accelerated somatic mutation calling for whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing data from heterogenous tumor samples
Shuangxi Ji, Tong Zhu, … Wenyi Wang·Genome ResearchPeer-reviewed·Apr 8, 2024
- Achieving reproducibility and accuracy in cancer mutation detection with whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing
Wenming Xiao, Luyao Ren, … Leming M. Shi·Nature BiotechnologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2021
- The Impact of Variant Calling on Substitution Mutational Signature Inference
Zichen Jiang, Jessica N. Au, … Ludmil B. Alexandrov·bioRxiv·Dec 12, 2025
- Whole Genome and Exome Sequencing Reference Datasets from A Multi-center and Cross-platform Benchmark Study
Yongmei Zhao, Li Tai Fang, … Wenming Xiao·Scientific DataPeer-reviewed·Nov 9, 2021
- The consequences of variant calling decisions in secondary analyses of cancer sequencing data
Carlos Antonio García-Prieto, Francisco Martínez-Jiménez, … Eduard Porta‐Pardo·bioRxiv·Jan 29, 2020
- Detecting Somatic Mutations Without Matched Normal Samples Using Long Reads
Jared T. Simpson·bioRxiv·Feb 26, 2024