henhaobio
Sign in

mBioMicrobiologyPeer-reviewed journal article

Colibactin-induced damage in bacteria is cell contact independent

Emily LowryiD, Amir MitchelliD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

The bacterial toxin colibactin, produced primarily by the B2 phylogroup of Escherichia coli, underlies some cases of colorectal cancers. Colibactin crosslinks DNA and induces genotoxic damage in both mammalian and bacterial cells. While the mechanisms facilitating colibactin delivery remain unclear, results from multiple studies supported a delivery model that necessitates cell-cell contact. We directly tested this requirement in bacterial cultures by monitoring the spatiotemporal dynamics of the DNA damage response using a fluorescent transcriptional reporter. We found that in mixed-cell populations, DNA damage saturated within twelve hours and was detectable even in reporter cells separated from colibactin producers by hundreds of microns. Experiments with distinctly separated producer and reporter colonies revealed that the intensity of DNA damage decays similarly with distance regardless of colony contact. Our work reveals that cell contact is inconsequential for colibactin delivery in bacteria and suggests that contact-dependence needs to be reexamined in mammalian cells as well. ImportanceColibactin is a bacteria-produced toxin that binds and damages DNA. It has been widely studied in mammalian cells due to its potential role in tumorigenesis. However, fundamental questions about its impact in bacteria remain underexplored. We used E. coli as a model system to study colibactin toxicity in neighboring bacteria and directly tested if cell-cell contact is required for toxicity, as has previously been proposed. We found that colibactin can induce DNA damage in bacteria hundreds of microns away and that the intensity of DNA damage presents similarly regardless of cell-cell contact. Our work further suggests that the requirement for cell-cell contact for colibactin-induced toxicity also needs to be reevaluated in mammalian cells.

Citations
11
FWCI
2.57
Field percentile
top 10%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.