Lessons learned while evaluating how pairing aversive experiences with same or different sex social stimulus mice affects subsequent social engagement
Jasmin N. BeaveriD, Marissa M. NicodemusiD, Isabella R. Spalding, Lauren R. ScrimshawiD, Sohini DuttaiD, Aaron M. JasnowiD, T. Lee GilmaniD
Abstract
Mice offer a wealth of opportunities for investigating brain circuits regulating multiple behaviors, largely due to their genetic tractability. Social behaviors are translationally relevant, considering both mice and humans are highly social mammals, and human social behavior disruptions are key symptoms of myriad neuropsychiatric disorders. Stresses related to social experiences are particularly influential in the severity and maintenance of neuropsychiatric disorders like anxiety disorders, and trauma and stressor-related disorders. Yet, induction and study of social stress in mice has disproportionately focused on males, influenced heavily by their inherent territorial nature. Social target-instigated stress (i.e., defeat), while ethologically relevant, is quite variable and predominantly specific to males, making rigorous and sex-inclusive studies challenging. In pursuit of a controllable, consistent, high throughput, and sex-inclusive method for social stress elicitation, we modified a paradigm to train male and female F1 129S1/SvlmJ x C57BL/6J mice to associate (via classical conditioning) same or different sex C57BL/6J targets with a mild, aversive stimulus. While further paradigm optimization is required, social interaction testing 24 h after conditioning indicates males socially conditioned better to male targets by exhibiting reduced social interaction, whereas females appeared not to form social stimulus associations. Serum corticosterone levels inversely corresponded to social avoidance after different sex, but not same sex, conditioning, suggesting corticosterone-mediated arousal influences cross-sex interactions. These rigorously controlled null outcomes align with past pursuits limited success in creating a sex-inclusive social stress paradigm. Significance StatementValidated paradigms to study social stress in female mice, and across sexes, are needed. We modified a published male mouse protocol by using classical conditioning to pair an aversive stressor with a target. Our goal was to create a uniform, cross-sex, high-throughput social stress technique to advance future research. Though our modified paradigm requires future improvements, we did acquire evidence that males can be socially conditioned in this way, and female same sex social engagement can be attenuated by a preceding non-social aversive experience. These null findings, while not achieving our goal, provide useful information to advance future sex-inclusive social stress investigations.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Individual differences in volitional social motivation in male and female mice following social stress.
Jovana S. Navarrete, Kevin N. Schneider, … Sam A. Golden·bioRxiv·Nov 8, 2022
- Social Instability is an Effective Chronic Stress Paradigm for both Male and Female Mice
Christine N. Yohn, Sandra A. Ashamalla, … Benjamin Adam Samuels·NeuropharmacologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 16, 2019
- Sex differences in social synchronization of conditioned fear.
Wataru Ito, Alexei Morozov·bioRxiv·Oct 10, 2022
- Sex- and context-dependent effects of acute isolation on vocal and non-vocal social behaviors in mice
X. Zhao, P. Ziobro, … K. Tschida·bioRxiv·Apr 2, 2021
- Sex differences in chronic social stress models in mice
Orit Furman, Michael Tsoory, Alon Chen·bioRxiv·Apr 11, 2019
- Effects of footshock stress on social behavior and neuronal activation in the medial prefrontal cortex and amygdala of male and female mice
Mariia Dorofeikova, Chandrashekhar D. Borkar, … Jonathan Paul Fadok·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Feb 9, 2023