Morphomechanically-Informed Spatial Curvature Sequencing in Prostate Cancer
Ivan KordiciD, Felix G. Rivera MoctezumaiD, Hoseyn A. AmiriiD, Ajie Liu, Shuangyi CaiiD, Mehdia Nadeem Rajab AliiD, Lourdes T. BreaiD, Abhijeet Venkataraman, Hongshun Shi, Lara Rabih HarikiD, Todd SulchekiD, Jindan YuiD, Ahmet F. CoskuniD
Abstract
Morphological changes in prostate glands, assessed by Gleason grading, remain the gold standard for diagnosing prostate cancer, yet molecular biomarkers associated with gland shape are not well understood. Here, we introduce CurvSeq, a mechanomorphology-informed framework for spatial sequencing data, and CurvSee, its complementary version for proteomic and imaging datasets. These methods integrate gland boundary curvature, pocket architecture, microenvironmental composition, and molecular profiles to study morphomechanical relationships in prostate adenocarcinoma. Using five independent spatial transcriptomic and multiplexed imaging datasets, we segmented individual prostate glands, extracted gland contours, quantified local curvature and pocket-like concavities, and projected these features onto spatially resolved gene and protein measurements. In Xenium data, CurvSeq distinguished benign and GG1 glands, identifying cancer-associated genes such as PCA3 and AMACR in GG1 glands and basal, basement membrane, and mechanotransduction-associated programs in benign glands. In Visium data, a diffusion-based morphomechanical score ordered benign glands by area, circularity, pocket number, smooth muscle abundance, immune-cell proximity, and remodeling-associated genes including MMP7. In GG4 glands, CurvSeq identified neuroendocrine-like boundary regions associated with MMP7 expression, COL1A1-rich adjacent stroma, and immune-cell accumulation. Finally, CurvSee extended this framework to multiplexed protein imaging, where combined morphology and protein-expression features distinguished Gleason-associated gland states. Together, CurvSeq and CurvSee provide a quantitative framework for linking gland architecture, local microenvironment, and molecular state, showing that prostate gland morphology can be integrated with spatial omics to identify morphomechanical niches associated with cancer progression.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Automatic Classification of Prostate Cancer Gleason Scores from Digitized Whole Slide Tissue Biopsies
Hongming Xu, Sunho Park, Tae Hyun Hwang·bioRxiv·May 9, 2018
- Relationship between tumor grade and geometrical complexity in prostate cancer
J.A. Llanos-Pérez, E. Tejera-Puente, … M. P. De Miguel·bioRxiv·Feb 8, 2015
- Spatial single-cell proteomics defines multicellular niches in the primary prostate cancer microenvironment
Adriano Luca Martinelli, Andrea Brunello, … Marianna Kruithof‐de Julio·bioRxiv·May 5, 2026
- Ultrastructural analysis of prostate cancer tissue provides insights into androgen-dependent adaptations to membrane contact site establishment
L. M. Butler, E. Evergren·bioRxiv·May 10, 2023
- Prostate cancer associated fibroblasts have distinct morphomechanical features that are associated with patient outcome
Antje Garside, Angela Jacobi, … Anna Verena Taubenberger·bioRxiv·Mar 21, 2025
- Assessment of the Utility of Gene Positioning Biomarkers in the Stratification of Prostate Cancers
K. Meaburn, T. Misteli·bioRxiv·Aug 8, 2019