henhaobio
Sign in

Association for Women in Mathematics seriesNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

The Modulation of Pain by Circadian and Sleep-Dependent Processes: A Review of the Experimental Evidence

Megan Hastings HagenaueriD, Jennifer A. CrodelleiD, Sofia H. Piltz, Natalia ToporikovaiD, Paige F. B. FergusoniD, Victoria BoothiD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

This proceedings paper is the first in a series of three papers developing mathematical models for the complex relationship between pain and the sleep-wake cycle. Here, we briefly review what is known about the relationship between pain and the sleep-wake cycle in humans and laboratory rodents in an effort to identify constraints for the models. While it is well accepted that sleep behavior is regulated by a daily (circadian) timekeeping system and homeostatic sleep drive, the joint modulation of these two primary biological processes on pain sensitivity has not been considered. Under experimental conditions, pain sensitivity varies across the 24 h day, with highest sensitivity occurring during the evening in humans. Pain sensitivity is also modulated by sleep behavior, with pain sensitivity increasing in response to the build up of homeostatic sleep pressure following sleep deprivation or sleep disruption. To explore the interaction between these two biological processes using modeling, we first compare the magnitude of their effects across a variety of experimental pain studies in humans. To do this comparison, we normalize the results from experimental pain studies relative to the range of physiologicallymeaningful stimulation levels. Following this normalization, we find that the estimated impact of the daily rhythm and of sleep deprivation on experimental pain measurements is surprisingly consistent across different pain modalities. We also review evidence documenting the impact of circadian rhythms and sleep deprivation on the neural circuitry in the spinal cord underlying pain sensation. The characterization of sleep-dependent and circadian influences on pain sensitivity in this review paper is used to develop and constrain the mathematical models introduced in the two companion articles.

Citations
39
FWCI
11.42
Field percentile
top 2%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISToporikova '17Daguet '20Crodelle '17Yao '26Burek '25Lüthi '21
90% semantic matchNeuroscience
Natalia Toporikova, Megan Hastings Hagenauer, Paige F. B. Ferguson+1 more·Association for Women in Mathematics series·Jan 1, 2017· 1 citations