Combining genome-wide polygenic scores with registry data for colorectal cancer risk-based screening
Anne Krogh NøhriD, Marie Giehm Overby, Mads Munk Nielsen, Emil-August Torp, Rikke Hedegaard JenseniD, Laurids Østergaard PoulseniD, Ole Thorlacius‐UssingiD, Simon Ladefoged RasmusseniD, Berit Sanne AnderseniD, Ismail GögenüriD, Erik SørenseniD, Ole Birger Vesterager PederseniD, Christian ErikstrupiD, Nanna BrønsiD, Michael SchwinniD, Christina MikkelseniD, Mie Topholm BruuniD, Maléne Møller JørgenseniD, Claus Anders BertelseniD, Jens Georg Hillingsø, Estrid Vilma Solyom HøgdalliD, Sisse Rye OstrowskiiD, Karina BanasikiD, Jakob Bay, Andrea Barghetti, , Steffen UIlltz Thorsen
Abstract
BackgroundAggregating effects of common genetic variants into a polygenic risk score (PRS) has shown potential for risk-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. However, its utility must be evaluated in ancestrally diverse populations with diverse tumor characteristics and compared to the current screening standard, the fecal immunochemical test (FIT). ObjectiveEvaluate the utility of PRS for risk-based CRC screening. DesignThe cohort included 112,204 individuals from the Copenhagen Hospital Biobank (8,995 with adenoma and 9,246 with CRC), all with linked genetic and health registry data. A subset (N=20,658) also had available FIT results. CRC PRSs were evaluated for their association with lifetime adenoma and CRC risk and their predictive value individually and combined with FIT. ResultsPRS stratified population-calibrated lifetime adenoma and CRC risk independently of ancestry and sex. Incidence curves showed that individuals with a high PRS reached the incidence levels of low-PRS individuals around 10 years earlier, between ages 45 to 60. PRS also stratified risk across tumor location and histology but showed no association among individuals with deficient mismatch repair tumors (N=623). Predictive modeling indicated that combing PRS with FIT did not meaningfully improve prediction of adenoma or CRC at first screening, negative colonoscopy outcomes among FIT-positive participants, or adenoma or CRC occurrence within two years after a negative FIT. ConclusionPRS effectively stratifies lifetime adenoma and CRC risk and shows promise for guiding risk-based screening initiation and intensity. When combined with FIT, it adds limited additional predictive value.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 0th percentile
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Precision Colorectal Cancer Screening with Polygenic Risk Score
Tõnis Tasa, Mikk Puustusmaa, … Peeter Padrik·medRxiv·Aug 19, 2020
- Colorectal cancer risk stratification using a polygenic risk score in symptomatic patients presenting to primary care -- a UK Biobank retrospective cohort study
Bethan Mallabar-Rimmer, Samuel WD Merriel, … Harry Green·European Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 1, 2024
- Improving Consistency in Colorectal Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment and Return of Results Through an Integrated Polygenic Risk Score
Huy Tran, Ashley J Mulford, … Jianfeng Xu·medRxiv·Nov 9, 2026
- Combining Asian-European Genome-Wide Association Studies of Colorectal Cancer Improves Risk Prediction Across Race and Ethnicity
Minta Thomas, Yu‐Ru Su, … Taiki Yamaji·medRxiv·Jan 19, 2023
- Ability of a polygenic risk score to refine colorectal cancer risk in Lynch syndrome
Núria Dueñas, Hannah Klinkhammer, … Joan Brunet·Journal of Medical GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 15, 2023
- Comparing ancestry calibration approaches for a trans-ancestry colorectal cancer polygenic risk score
Elisabeth A. Rosenthal, Li Hsu, … Gail Pairitz Jarvik·medRxiv·Oct 23, 2023