medRxivGenetic & Genomic MedicinePreprint
Combining Asian-European Genome-Wide Association Studies of Colorectal Cancer Improves Risk Prediction Across Race and Ethnicity
Minta ThomasiD, Yu‐Ru SuiD, Elisabeth A. RosenthaliD, Lori C. SakodaiD, Stephanie L. SchmitiD, Maria N TimofeevaiD, Zhishan CheniD, Ceres Fernández–RozadillaiD, Philip LawiD, Neil MurphyiD, Robert Carreras‐TorresiD, Virginia Díez‐ObreroiD, Fränzel JB van Duijnhoven, Shangqing JiangiD, Aesun ShiniD, Alicja WolkiD, Amanda I. PhippsiD, Andrea N. Burnett‐HartmaniD, Andrea GsuriD, Andrew Tan ChaniD, Ann Graham ZauberiD, Anna H. WuiD, Annika LindblomiD, Caroline Y. UmiD, Catherine M. TangeniD, , Taiki YamajiiD
Abstract
Polygenic risk scores (PRS) have great potential to guide precision colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention by identifying those at higher risk to undertake targeted screening. However, current PRS using European ancestry data have sub-optimal performance in non-European ancestry populations, limiting their utility among these populations. Towards addressing this deficiency, we expanded PRS development for CRC by incorporating Asian ancestry data (21,731 cases; 47,444 controls) into European ancestry training datasets (78,473 cases; 107,143 controls). The AUC estimates (95% CI) of PRS were 0.63(0.62-0.64), 0.59(0.57-0.61), 0.62(0.60-0.63), and 0.65(0.63-0.66) in independent datasets including 1,681-3,651 cases and 8,696-115,105 controls of Asian, Black/African American, Latinx/Hispanic, and non-Hispanic White, respectively. They were significantly better than the European-centric PRS in all four major US racial and ethnic groups (p-values<0.05). Further inclusion of non-European ancestry populations, especially Black/African American and Latinx/Hispanic, is needed to improve the risk prediction and enhance equity in applying PRS in clinical practice.
- organism: human
- assay: GWAS summary statistics
- research focus: GWAS / association mapping
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 1
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Comparing ancestry calibration approaches for a trans-ancestry colorectal cancer polygenic risk score
Elisabeth A. Rosenthal, Li Hsu, … Gail Pairitz Jarvik·medRxiv·Oct 23, 2023
- Combining genome-wide polygenic scores with registry data for colorectal cancer risk-based screening
Anne Krogh Nøhr, Marie Giehm Overby, … Steffen UIlltz Thorsen·British Journal of CancerPeer-reviewed·Jul 14, 2026
- Improving Consistency in Colorectal Cancer Genetic Risk Assessment and Return of Results Through an Integrated Polygenic Risk Score
Huy Tran, Ashley J Mulford, … Jianfeng Xu·medRxiv·Nov 9, 2026
- Precision Colorectal Cancer Screening with Polygenic Risk Score
Tõnis Tasa, Mikk Puustusmaa, … Peeter Padrik·medRxiv·Aug 19, 2020
- Performance of polygenic risk scores for cancer prediction in a racially diverse academic biobank
Louise L. Wang, Heena Desai, … Kara N. Maxwell·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·Nov 30, 2021
- Ability of a polygenic risk score to refine colorectal cancer risk in Lynch syndrome
Núria Dueñas, Hannah Klinkhammer, … Joan Brunet·Journal of Medical GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 15, 2023