Rare non-synonymous germline mutations systematically define the risk of triple negative breast cancer
Mei Yang, Yanhui FaniD, Zhi-Yong Wu, Zhendong FengiD, Qiangzu ZhangiD, Shunhua Han, Xiaoling Li, Teng Zhu, Minyi Cheng, Juntao Xu, Ciqiu Yang, Hongfei Gao, Chunming ZhangiD, Guangming TaniD, Michael Q. Zhang, You-Qiang Song, Gang Niu, Kun Wang
Abstract
Early identification of the risk for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) at the asymptomatic phase could lead to better prognosis. Here we developed a machine learning method to quantify systematic impact of all rare germline mutations on each pathway. We collected 106 TNBC patients and 287 elder healthy women controls. The spectra of activity profiles in multiple pathways were mapped and most pathway activities exhibited globally suppressed by the portfolio of individual germline mutations in TNBC patients. Accordingly, all individuals were delineated into two types: A and B. Type A patients could be differentiated from controls (AUC = 0.89) and sensitive to BRCA1/2 damages; Type B patients can be also differentiated from controls (AUC = 0.69) but probably being protected from BRCA1/2 damages. Further we found that Individuals with the lowest activity of selected pathways had extreme high relative risk (up to 21.67 in type A) and increased lymph node metastasis in these patients. Our study showed that genomic DNA contains information of unimaginable pathogenic factors. And this information is in a distributed form that could be applied to risk assessment for more cancer types. SignificanceWe identified individuals who are more susceptible to triple negative breast cancer. Our method performs much better than previous assessments based on BRCA1/2 damages, even polygenic risk scores. We disclosed previously unimaginable pathogens in a distributed form on genome and extended risk prediction to scenarios for other cancers.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papersReproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Assessing germline mutational profile and its clinicopathological associations in Triple Negative Breast Cancer
Jisha John, Ashwini C. Bapat, … Chaitanyanand B. Koppiker·Cancer GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 18, 2025
- Gene expression signature for predicting homologous recombination deficiency in triple-negative breast cancer
- Risk factors, prognostic factors, and nomograms for distant metastasis in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: a population-based study
Hongguo Guo, Song L. Qiao, … Wanling Lu·MedicinePeer-reviewed·Sep 26, 2025
- Genetic assessments of breast cancer risk that do not account for polygenic background are incomplete and lead to incorrect preventative strategies
George Busby, Paul Craig, … Giordano Bottà·medRxiv·Aug 13, 2021
- Determining susceptibility loci in triple negative breast cancer using a novel pre-clinical model
Samson Eugin Simon, Boston W. Simmons, … Liza Makowski·bioRxiv·Feb 8, 2024
- Prenatal BRCA1 epimutations contribute significantly to triple-negative breast cancer development
Oleksii Nikolaienko, Hans Petter Eikesdal, … Per Eystein Lønning·medRxiv·May 14, 2023