Evaluating mainstreaming in pediatric immunology: an optimal model of care
Emily DeBortoliiD, Tenielle ClinchiD, Larissa Vaz-GonçalvesiD, Lucy BurburyiD, Cian Thomas, Meg Jeppesen, Alberto Pinzón‐CharryiD, Mariana Melo, Anna SullivaniD, Matthew F. Hunter, Jane PeakeiD, Aideen M McInerney-LeoiD, Peter B. McNaughtoniD, Tatiane YanesiD
Abstract
PurposeWhile genomic testing is integral to pediatric inborn errors of immunity (IEI) care, few studies have examined strategies to support its optimal delivery. This study aimed to characterize a pediatric IEI cohort and assess the impact of implementing a mainstream model-of-care (MoC). Materials/MethodsComprehensive chart audit was conducted for patients ([≤]18y) who received IEI genomic testing in Queensland, Australia, from 2017-2025. Descriptive analyses captured demographic and clinical characteristics, genomic testing and results, and management outcomes. Inferential analyses assessed changes in genomic practices pre-MoC (<2021) and post-MoC ([≥]2021). Results322 patients met eligibility criteria (n=481 genomic test). Diagnostic yield (27.6%) varied by testing indication, with the highest rate among phagocytic defects (n=4/4;100%) and severe combined immunodeficiency (n=8/10;80%). Very-early-onset inflammatory bowel disease had the lowest diagnostic yield (n=3/68;4.4%), prompting changes to testing criteria. Molecular diagnosis resulted in management changes for 90.5% patients. Genomic testing was widely used pre-MoC (n=251 genomic tests). All outcomes significantly improved pre-and post-MoC (p<0.05): duplicate testing decreased (13.9% to 0%); variants of uncertain significance reduced (37.7% to 7.1%); informed consent documentation increased (70.5% to 88.4%); and diagnostic yield increased (16.2% to 27.4%). ConclusionTargeted interventions are needed to support delivery of genomic testing and strengthen service effectiveness.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Multidimensional and Longitudinal Impact of a Genetic Diagnosis for Critically Ill Infants
Monica Hsiung Wojcik, Maya C. del Rosario, … Ingrid A. Holm·PEDIATRICSPeer-reviewed·Nov 8, 2024
- The Implementation, Diagnostic Yield and Clinical Outcome of Genetic Testing on an Inpatient Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Service
Aaron D. Besterman, Joshua Sadik, … Julián A. Martínez-Agosto·Autism ResearchPeer-reviewed·Jul 14, 2020
- The NYCKidSeq project: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial incorporating genomics into the clinical care of diverse New York City children
Jacqueline A. Odgis, Katie M. Gallagher, … Eimear E. Kenny·TrialsPeer-reviewed·Jan 14, 2021
- Prospective evaluation of genome sequencing versus standard-of-care as a first molecular diagnostic test
Deanna Brockman, Christina Anne Austin-Tse, … Miriam S. Udler·Genetics in MedicinePeer-reviewed·May 11, 2021
- Clinical exome sequencing data from patients with inborn errors of immunity: cohort level meta-analysis and the benefit of systematic reanalysis
Emil E. Vorsteveld, Caspar I. van der Made, … Alexander Hoischen·medRxiv·Jun 14, 2024
- Rapid Genome Sequencing Compared to a Gene Panel in Critically Ill Infants with a Suspected Genetic Disorder: An Economic Evaluation
Tara A. Lavelle, Jill L. Maron, … Jonathan M. Davis·The Journal of PediatricsPeer-reviewed·Nov 1, 2025