Transferability and accuracy of electronic health record-based predictors compared to polygenic scores
Kira E. DetroisiD, Tuomo HartoneniD, Maris Teder‐LavingiD, Bradley S. JermyiD, Kristi LälliD, Zhiyu Yang, Reedik MägiiD, Samuli RipattiiD, Andrea GannaiD
Abstract
Electronic health record (EHR)-based phenotype risk scores (PheRS) leverage individuals health trajectories to infer disease risk. Similarly, polygenic scores (PGS) use genetic information to estimate disease risk. While PGS generalizability has been previously studied, less is known about PheRS transferability across healthcare systems and whether PheRS provide complementary risk information to PGS. We trained PheRS to predict the onset of 13 common diseases with high health burden in a total of 845,929 individuals (age 32-70) from 3 biobank-based studies from Finland (FinnGen), the UK (UKB) and Estonia (EstB). The PheRS were based on elastic-net models, incorporating up to 242 diagnoses captured in the EHR up to 10 years before baseline. Individuals were followed up for a maximum of 8 years, during which disease incidence was observed. PGS were calculated for each disease using recent publicly available results from genome-wide association studies. All 13 PheRS were significantly associated with the diseases of interest. The PheRS trained in different biobanks utilized partially distinct diagnoses, reflecting differences in medical code usage across the countries. Even with the large variability in the prevalence of various diagnoses, most PheRS trained in the UKB or EstB transferred well to FinnGen without re-training. PheRS and PGS were only moderately correlated (Pearsons r ranging from 0.00 to 0.08), and models including both PheRS and PGS improved onset prediction compared to PGS alone for 8/13 diseases. PheRS was able to identify a subset of individuals at high-risk better than PGS for 8/13 disease. Our results indicate that EHR-based risk scores and PGS capture largely independent information and provide additive benefits for disease risk prediction. Furthermore, for many diseases the PheRS models transfer well between different EHRs. Given the large availability of EHR, PheRS can provide a complementary tool to PGS for risk stratification.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 1
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Incorporating family history of disease improves polygenic risk scores in diverse populations
Margaux L.A. Hujoel, Po‐Ru Loh, … Alkes L. Price·Cell GenomicsPeer-reviewed·Jul 1, 2022
- The phers R package: using phenotype risk scores based on electronic health records to study Mendelian disease and rare genetic variants
Layla Aref, Lisa A. Bastarache, Jacob Hughey·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Sep 9, 2022
- Evaluation of phenotyping errors on polygenic risk score predictions
Ruowang Li, Jiayi Tong, … Jason H. Moore·bioRxiv·Aug 4, 2019
- Improving polygenic risk prediction performance through integrating electronic health records by phenotype embedding
Leqi Xu, Wangjie Zheng, … Hongyu Zhao·The American Journal of Human GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 1, 2025
- Methylation risk scores are associated with a collection of phenotypes within electronic health record systems
Mike Thompson, Brian L. Hill, … Eran Halperin·npj Genomic MedicinePeer-reviewed·Aug 25, 2022
- The impact of polygenic score and socioeconomic status in predicting risk for 19 complex diseases
Fiona A. Hagenbeek, Anne Richmond, … Samuli Ripatti·medRxiv·Sep 2, 2025