In-ear-tACS: Auditory Perception and Side Effects depend on Electrode Montage, Frequency, and DC-Offset
Luca Marie Reinema, Arnd MeiseriD, Niklas Mellerke, Daniela Rodriguez de Castro, Heiko I. StecheriD, Andreas RadeloffiD, Christoph Siegfried HerrmanniD
Abstract
BackgroundNon-invasive transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) of the cochlea might be a promising new therapeutic option for patients with chronic tinnitus. However, electric stimulation of small, sensitive target regions, such as the inner ear, can cause adverse side effects (SEs). ObjectiveTo identify stimulation parameters with low side-effect profiles while reliably stimulating the cochlea, thereby improving patient comfort and safety and paving the way for the development of a medical device for treating patients with chronic tinnitus. ApproachHearing-healthy participants were stimulated with electrodes in the ear canal. Stimulation of the cochlea elicits a soft hearing impression (HI) in participants, indicating successful stimulation of the early auditory pathway. We systematically compare HS and SEs across distinct electrode configurations and stimulation parameters, including stimulation frequency and the presence of a Direct Current (DC)-offset. We record SE occurrence via visual analog scales after stimulation. Main ResultsWe find that tACS stimulation between 250 Hz and 2000 Hz reliably elicits HIs in participants. SEs are generally low. No occurrence of SEs resulted in participant withdrawal or severe adverse events, with only phosphenes, skin tingling, and a sense of vibration being reported as impactful. The addition of a slight DC-offset increases the occurrence and magnitude of SEs considerably. SignificanceOur results demonstrate the feasibility of tACS in non-invasively stimulating the auditory pathway with minimal adverse SE. Stimulation parameters with a low SE profile can be applied in further studies with tinnitus patients.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- 1th percentile
- Organism
- Assay
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Behavioral entrainment to rhythmic auditory stimulation can be modulated by tACS depending on the electrical stimulation field properties
Yuranny Cabral‐Calderín, Daniela van Hinsberg, … Molly J. Henry·eLifePeer-reviewed·Jul 21, 2023
- Characterizing Low-Frequency Artifacts During Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation (tTIS)
Jill von Conta, Florian H. Kasten, … Christoph Siegfried Herrmann·Neuroimage ReportsPeer-reviewed·Jun 21, 2022
- Superiority of Rhythmic Auditory Signals over Electrical Stimulation to Entrain Behavior
Yuranny Cabral‐Calderín, Molly J. Henry·bioRxiv·Aug 12, 2024
- Individual-specific effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on 40-Hz auditory steady-state responses
Aurimas Mockevičius, Xiaojuan Wang, … Inga Griškova-Bulanova·IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2025
- Extracochlear Electric Stimulation - Toward Non-Invasive Hearing Restoration
Robert Hart, Patrick Hinz, Waldo Nogueira·bioRxiv·Aug 18, 2026
- A minimum effective dose for (transcranial) alternating current stimulation
Ivan Alekseichuk, Miles Wischnewski, Alexander Opitz·Brain stimulationPeer-reviewed·Aug 28, 2022