bioRxivGeneticsPreprint
Chromosome length is not the sole determinant of sexually dimorphic crossover rates during mammalian meiosis: Insights from genetically diverse mouse strains
Tegan S. A. HoraniD, Anna J. WoodiD, Stephanie TanisiD, Carme Peirau GabarrelliD, Paula E. CoheniD
Abstract
Meiotic recombination generates crossovers (COs), reciprocal exchanges between homologous chromosomes critical for accurate chromosome segregation. Inappropriate CO frequency and distribution drive aneuploidy in human oocytes, with error rates up to 10-fold higher than in sperm despite females exhibiting higher CO frequencies. COs form in the context of the proteinaceous synaptonemal complex (SC) that tethers homologs during prophase I. SC length strongly correlates with CO number, and sexual dimorphism in recombination has long been attributed to longer SCs in females. However, this model is challenged by wild-derived PWD mice in which males consistently generate more COs despite having shorter SCs. Here, we exploit natural genetic variation among inbred mouse strains to dissect the structural and regulatory basis of sexually dimorphic CO regulation. Using cytological markers of SC assembly (SYCP3), recombination progression (RAD51, MSH4), class I CO designation (HEI10, MLH1/MLH3), and chiasmata, we show that SC length is not the sole predictor of CO number. PWD males exhibit stronger CO interference and higher CO number than females, despite reduced SC length. Notably, females show reduced efficiency in designating recombination intermediate to become COs, whereas PWD males display exceptional proficiency. Unexpectedly, although class II COs are rare, they play a disproportionate role in ensuring that every chromosome pair receives at least one CO, thereby safeguarding against aneuploidy. Together, these findings challenge the prevailing view that SC length is the primary determinant of sexually dimorphic CO rates and instead highlight sex-specific regulation of CO designation and pathway usage as key drivers of recombination outcomes.
- organism: mouse
- assay: proteomics
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: differential expression
- research focus: gene regulatory network inference
- research focus: cell-cell communication
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 2
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Sex differences in crossover interference in house mice
Andrew Parker Morgan·G3 Genes Genomes GeneticsPeer-reviewed·Nov 6, 2025
- Sex-Specific Evolution of the Genome-wide Recombination Rate
April L. Peterson, Bret A. Payseur·bioRxiv·Jul 8, 2020
- Dual control of meiotic crossover patterning
Stéphanie Durand, Qichao Lian, … Raphaël Mercier·bioRxiv·May 11, 2022
- Sexual dimorphic regulation of recombination by the synaptonemal complex
Cori K. Cahoon, Colette M Richter, … Diana E. Libuda·eLifePeer-reviewed·Oct 5, 2023
- Local and sex-specific biases in crossover vs. noncrossover outcomes at meiotic recombination hotspots in mouse
Esther de Boer, Maria Jasin, Scott Keeney·bioRxiv·Jul 19, 2015
- Extensive sex differences at the initiation of genetic recombination
Kevin Brick, Sarah Thibault-Sennett, … Galina V. Petukhova·NaturePeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2018