The initial response of females towards congeneric males matches the propensity to hybridise in Ophthalmotilapia.
M. Van Steenberge, N. Jublier, L. Kever, S. Gresham, S. Derycke, J. Snoeks, E. Parmentier, P. Poncin, E. Verheyen
Abstract
AO_SCPLOWBSTRACTC_SCPLOWCichlid radiations often harbour closely related species with overlapping niches and distribution ranges. Such species sometimes hybridise in nature, which raises the question how can they coexist. This also holds for the Tanganyika mouthbrooders Ophthalmotilapia ventralis and O. nasuta. Earlier studies found indications of asymmetrical hybridisation with females of O. ventralis accepting males of O. nasuta, but not the other way around. We hypothesised that this was due to differences in the capacity for species recognition. Given the higher propensity of O. ventralis females towards hybridisation, we expect a reduced ability for species recognition in O. ventralis females, compared to O. nasuta females. We staged two experiments, one focusing on 22 female O. nasuta and one on 21 female O. ventralis. These fish were placed in one half of a tank and briefly exposed to a conspecific or a heterospecific male, a conspecific female, or nothing (control). Female response was evaluated by scoring six tracking parameters and by noting the occurrence of ten discrete behaviours before and during the encounter. Females always responded to the presence of another fish by approaching it. Remarkably, for both O. nasuta and O. ventralis, we did not find a different response between encounters with conspecific males and females. However, in agreement with our hypothesis, O. nasuta females behaved differently towards conspecific or heterospecific males, whereas O. ventralis females did not. When presented with a heterospecific male, O. nasuta females performed a lower number of ram behaviours. Additionally, they never displayed the flee behaviour, a component of the species mating repertoire that was seen in all but one of the presentations with a conspecific male. Our findings show that differences in species recognition at first encounter predict to a large degree the outcome of the mating process, even in the absence of mating behaviour.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Can cryptic female choice prevent invasive hybridization in external fertilizing fish?
T. H. Lantiegne, C. F. Purchase·bioRxiv·Dec 17, 2021
- Divergence in female damselfly sensory structures is consistent with a species recognition function but shows no evidence of reproductive character displacement
A. A. Barnard, J. P. Masly·bioRxiv·Jun 21, 2018
- Equal performance but distinct behaviors: Astatotilapia burtoni sex differences in a novel object recognition task and spatial maze
K. J. Wallace, H. A. Hofmann·bioRxiv·Aug 3, 2020
- Effects of social position on subsequent courtship and mating activity in an African cichlid
Anastasia Martashvili, Sara Jedwab, … Sebastian Gaston Alvarado·HydrobiologiaPeer-reviewed·Nov 28, 2024
- Hybridization and postzygotic isolation promote reinforcement of male mating preferences in a diverse group of fishes with traditional sex roles
R. L. Moran, M. Zhou, … R. C. Fuller·bioRxiv·May 20, 2018
- Mechanical And Tactile Incompatibilities Cause Reproductive Isolation Between Two Young Damselfly Species
A. Barnard, O. M. Fincke, … J. P. Masly·bioRxiv·May 28, 2017