bioRxivScientific Communication & Education
The Mastery Rubric for Bioinformatics: supporting design and evaluation of career-spanning education and training
Abstract
As the life sciences have become more data intensive, the pressure to incorporate the requisite training into life-science education and training programs has increased. To facilitate curriculum development, various sets of (bio)informatics competencies have been articulated; however, these have proved difficult to implement in practice. Addressing this issue, we have created a curriculum-design and -evaluation tool to support the development of specific Knowledge, Skills and Abilities (KSAs) that reflect the scientific method and promote both bioinformatics practice and the achievement of competencies. Twelve KSAs were extracted via formal analysis, and stages along a developmental trajectory, from uninitiated student to independent practitioner, were identified. Demonstration of each KSA by a performer at each stage was initially described (Performance Level Descriptors, PLDs), evaluated, and revised at an international workshop. This work was subsequently extended and further refined to yield the Mastery Rubric for Bioinformatics (MR-Bi). The MR-Bi was validated by demonstrating alignment between the KSAs and competencies, and its consistency with principles of adult learning. The MR-Bi tool provides a formal framework to support curriculum building, training, and self-directed learning. It prioritizes the development of independence and scientific reasoning, and is structured to allow individuals (regardless of career stage, disciplinary background, or skill level) to locate themselves within the framework. The KSAs and their PLDs promote scientific problem formulation and problem solving, lending the MR-Bi durability and flexibility. With its explicit developmental trajectory, the tool can be used by developing or practicing scientists to direct their (and their teams) acquisition of new, or to deepen existing, bioinformatics KSAs. The MR-Bi can thereby contribute to the cultivation of a next generation of bioinformaticians who are able to design reproducible and rigorous research, and to critically analyze results from their own, and others, work.
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: software / tool
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: benchmark study
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Bioinformatics Core Competencies for Undergraduate Life Sciences Education
Melissa A. Wilson Sayres, Charles R. Hauser, … Mark Pauley·PLoS ONEPeer-reviewed·Jun 5, 2018
- BioSkills Guide: Development and National Validation of a Tool for Interpreting the Vision and Change Core Competencies
A. Clemmons, J. Timbrook, … A. Crowe·bioRxiv·Jan 11, 2020
- A global perspective on bioinformatics training needs
M. D. Brazas, C. Brooksbank, … T. K. Attwood·bioRxiv·Feb 27, 2017
- League of Brazilian Bioinformatics: a competition framework to promote scientific training
L. M. Carvalho, N. Coimbra, … S. Nagamatsu·bioRxiv·Dec 17, 2020
- Bioschemas Training Profiles: A set of specifications for standardizing training information to facilitate the discovery of training programs and resources
L. Jael Castro, P. M. Palagi, … M. D. Brazas·bioRxiv·Nov 24, 2022
- Barriers to Integration of Bioinformatics into Undergraduate Life Sciences Education
Jason J. Williams, Jennifer C. Drew, … Mark A. Pauley·bioRxiv·Oct 19, 2017