PLoS BiologyBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Identifiers for the 21st century:How to design, provision, and reuse persistent identifiers to maximize utility and impact of life science data
Julie A. McMurryiD, Nick JutyiD, Niklas BlombergiD, Tony BurdettiD, Tom ConliniD, Nathalie ConteiD, Mélanie CourtotiD, John DeckiD, Michel DumontieriD, Donal K. FellowsiD, Alejandra N Gonzalez-BeltraniD, Philipp GormannsiD, Jeffrey Sean GretheiD, Janna HastingsiD, Henning HermjakobiD, Jean-Karim HèrichéiD, Jon IsoniD, Rafael C. JiméneziD, Simon JuppiD, John KunzeiD, Camille LaibeiD, Nicolas Gambardella Le NovèreiD, JAMES M. MALONEiD, Maria Jesus MartiniD, Johanna McEntyreiD, , Helen ParkinsoniD
Abstract
In many disciplines, data is highly decentralized across thousands of online databases (repositories, registries, and knowledgebases). Wringing value from such databases depends on the discipline of data science and on the humble bricks and mortar that make integration possible; identifiers are a core component of this integration infrastructure. Drawing on our experience and on work by other groups, we outline ten lessons we have learned about the identifier qualities and best practices that facilitate large-scale data integration. Specifically, we propose actions that identifier practitioners (database providers) should take in the design, provision and reuse of identifiers; we also outline important considerations for those referencing identifiers in various circumstances, including by authors and data generators. While the importance and relevance of each lesson will vary by context, there is a need for increased awareness about how to avoid and manage common identifier problems, especially those related to persistence and web-accessibility/resolvability. We focus strongly on web-based identifiers in the life sciences; however, the principles are broadly relevant to other disciplines.
- Citations
- 142
- FWCI
- 29.51
- Field percentile
- top 1%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Uniform Resolution of Compact Identifiers for Biomedical Data
Sarala Wimalaratne, Nick Juty, … Tim Clark·Scientific DataPeer-reviewed·May 8, 2018
- Wikidata: A platform for data integration and dissemination for the life sciences and beyond
Elvira Mitraka, Andra Waagmeester, … Benjamin M. Good·bioRxiv·Nov 16, 2015
- Best Practice Data Life Cycle Approaches for the Life Sciences
Philippa C. Griffin, Jyoti R. Khadake, … Maria Victoria Schneider·F1000ResearchPeer-reviewed·Aug 31, 2017
- Analyzing the Naming Conventions of Life Science Data Resources to Inform Human and Computational Findability
H.J. Imker, Hua Ou·bioRxiv·Oct 2, 2025
- Sustainability During Instability: Long-Lived Life Science Databases and Science Funding Outlook in the United States
H.J. Imker·bioRxiv·Oct 8, 2025
- Two real use cases of FAIR maturity indicators in the life sciences
Ammar Ammar, Serena Bonaretti, … Egon Willighagen·NanomaterialsPeer-reviewed·Oct 20, 2020