Hip thrust and back squat training elicit similar gluteus muscle hypertrophy and transfer similarly to the deadlift
D. L. Plotkin, M. A. Rodas, A. Vigotsky, M. C. McIntosh, E. Breeze, R. Ubrik, C. Robitzsch, A. Agyin-Birikorang, M. L. Mattingly, J. M. Michel, N. J. Kontos, A. D. Fruge, C. M. Wilburn, W. H. Weimar, A. Bashir, R. J. Beyers, M. Henselmans, B. M. Contreras, M. D. Roberts
Abstract
PurposeWe examined how set-volume equated resistance training using either the back squat (SQ) or hip thrust (HT) affected hypertrophy and various strength outcomes. MethodsUntrained college-aged participants were randomized into HT or SQ groups. Surface electromyograms (sEMG) from the right gluteus maximus and medius muscles were obtained during the first training session. Participants completed nine weeks of supervised training (15-17 sessions), before and after which we assessed muscle cross-sectional area (mCSA) via magnetic resonance imaging and strength via three-repetition maximum (3RM) testing and an isometric wall push test. ResultsGlutei mCSA growth was similar across both groups. Estimates [(-) favors HT; (+) favors SQ] modestly favored the HT compared to SQ for lower [effect {+/-} SE, -1.6 {+/-} 2.1 cm2], mid [-0.5 {+/-} 1.7 cm2], and upper [-0.5 {+/-} 2.6 cm2], but with appreciable variance. Gluteus medius+minimus [-1.8 {+/-} 1.5 cm2] and hamstrings [0.1 {+/-} 0.6 cm2] mCSA demonstrated little to no growth with small differences between groups. Thigh mCSA changes were greater in SQ for the quadriceps [3.6 {+/-} 1.5 cm2] and adductors [2.5 {+/-} 0.7 cm2]. Squat 3RM increases favored SQ [14 {+/-} 2.5 kg] and hip thrust 3RM favored HT [-26 {+/-} 5 kg]. 3RM deadlift [0 {+/-} 2 kg] and wall push strength [-7 {+/-} 13 N] similarly improved. All measured gluteal sites showed greater mean sEMG amplitudes during the first bout hip thrust versus squat set, but this did not consistently predict gluteal hypertrophy outcomes. ConclusionNine weeks of squat versus hip thrust training elicited similar gluteal hypertrophy, greater thigh hypertrophy in SQ, strength increases that favored exercise allocation, and similar strength transfers to the deadlift and wall push.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Optimizing athlete assessment of maximal force and rate of development A comparison of the isometric squat and mid-thigh pull
P. Read, J. Silva, … V. Sideris·bioRxiv·Apr 17, 2020
- Effects of High-Volume versus High-Load Resistance Training on Skeletal Muscle Growth and Molecular Adaptations
C. Vann, C. Sexton, … M. Roberts·bioRxiv·Jul 1, 2021
- A biomechanical comparison of the jerk, back jerk, vertical jump and jump squat.
J. Liu·bioRxiv·Mar 15, 2021
- Comparable Strength and Hypertrophic Adaptations to Low-Load and High-Load Resistance Exercise Training in Trained Individuals: Many Roads Lead to Rome
Kristoffer Toldnes Cumming, Ingrid Cecelia Elvatun, … Oscar Horwath·bioRxiv·Apr 28, 2025
- Changes in Body Composition, EMG, Kinematic and Kinetic Performance Following Velocity-Based Training vs. 1RM-Percentage Based Training
Jairo Alejandro Fernández Ortega, Laura del Pilar Prieto-Mondragón, Hugo Borges Sarmento·bioRxiv·Jan 23, 2026
- Large increases in resistance training volume do not impair skeletal muscle hypertrophy or anabolic-catabolic molecular signalling in trained individuals
Júlio Benvenutti Bueno de Camargo, Diego Bittencourt, … Cleiton Augusto Libardi·bioRxiv·Feb 24, 2026