Translational PsychiatryNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Predicting stress response trajectories: Differential contributions of limbic and prefrontal regions to cortisol and affective responses
Renée LipkaiD, Ludwig KreuzpointneriD, Christoph BärtliD, Marina GiglbergeriD, Julian KonzokiD, Hannah L. Peter, Nina Speicher, Lea WalleriD, Brigitte M. KudielkaiD, Stefan WüstiD, Henrik WalteriD, Gina‐Isabelle HenzeiD
- Citations
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.13
- Field percentile
- top 4%
Abstract
Why do individuals respond differently to stress? Since rodent studies indicated that stress regulation relies on limbic and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) outputs, we aimed to investigate whether data from these regions could also predict cortisol and affect trajectories following psychosocial stress in humans. In this pre-registered study, 281 healthy adults (145 female) were exposed to ScanSTRESS. Repeated assessments of salivary cortisol and negative affect were used to identify response trajectories (i.e. groups of participants) using latent class mixture modelling (LCMM). LCMMs without brain predictors were compared to LCMMs including structural (volume, thickness) and functional (activation, exposure-time effect) predictors from the amygdala, hippocampus, or mPFC regions. Results showed that cortisol LCMMs without brain predictors exhibited a single mean trajectory. Adding brain predictors resulted in three to four response trajectories, depending on region and outcome. Within identified models, cortisol hyper-response trajectories were predicted by larger amygdala and hippocampus volumes. Cortisol non-responses were predicted by greater amygdala activation and volume. Elevated baseline cortisol was predicted by higher hippocampal activation. mPFC markers did not predict cortisol trajectories, however, medial orbitofrontal cortex parameters identified affect response profiles mirroring trait-like affect. Together, our findings suggest dissociated roles of limbic and mPFC regions in stress regulation: While limbic structures predicted cortisol responses, the mPFC shaped affective experience.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Linking brain structure to stress reactivity: Cingulate surface area predicts acute cortisol responses
Emin Serin, Lea Sophie Schill, … Gina‐Isabelle Henze·Psychological MedicinePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2026
- Linking post-stress brain connectivity to acute cortisol reactivity using network-based inference and prediction
Emin Serin, Elvan Emurla, … Gina‐Isabelle Henze·bioRxiv·Aug 19, 2026
- Menstrual cycle phase and premenstrual symptoms in relation with the stress response: an fMRI study
Elise Bücklein, Ann-Christin Sophie Kimmig, … Ann‐Christine Ehlis·bioRxiv·Sep 25, 2026
- Chronic stress exacerbates acute stress-induced neuronal activation in the anterior cingulate cortex and ventral hippocampus that correlates with behavioral deficits in mice
Corey Fee, Thomas D. Prévot, … Etienne L. Sibille·NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·May 27, 2020
- Cortical-brainstem circuitry attenuates physiological stress reactivity
Sebastian A. Pace, Ema Lukinic, … Brent Myers·The Journal of PhysiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 14, 2024
- Time course of the physiological stress response to an acute stressor and its associations with the primacy and recency effect of the serial position curve
L. Becker, N. Rohleder·bioRxiv·Mar 5, 2019