Differential representations for affective and informative components of reward in the striatum and hippocampus
Xinxu SheniD, Kainan S. Wang, Vishnu P. MurtyiD, Mauricio R. DelgadoiD, David Victor SmithiD
Abstract
Receipt of a reward is composed of affective and informative components, which are often intertwined in most reward-processing and decision-making tasks. Our previous work allowed us to identify regions that were more strongly engaged for the affective and informative components of reward upon receipt (Smith et al., 2016) and showed that the ventral striatum responds to both affective and informative components of reward processing. However, the limited spatial resolution and coarse analytical approaches made it hard to understand how these different components of reward were represented in the brain, wherein similar engagement may not necessitate similar representations. In our current study, we used high-resolution functional magnetic resonance imaging (voxel size: 1.75 mm3) and representational similarity analysis to investigate the representation of affective and informative components of reward receipt in the striatum and the hippocampus, another region that is sensitive to reward information. We found a differential representation of affective and informative components of reward receipt in the striatum and the hippocampus, with no difference in representation between the two structures. However, in the dorsal striatum, we found that representations were stronger for affective rather than the informative components of reward receipt. Finally, we observed that the ventral striatum was sensitive to the predictiveness of information, such that across-run pattern similarity in the ventral striatum increased with the predictiveness of information. In sum, our results provide evidence of how affective and informative components of rewards are represented in the striatum and the hippocampus, potentially indicating a differential coding schema for the dorsal and the ventral striatum.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Differential contributions of ventral striatum subregions to the motivational and hedonic components of the affective processing of the reward
Eva R. Pool, David Muñoz Tord, … David Sander·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Feb 11, 2022
- Distinct temporal difference error signals in dopamine axons in three regions of the striatum in a decision-making task
Iku Tsutsui‐Kimura, Hideyuki Matsumoto, … Mitsuko Watabe‐Uchida·eLifePeer-reviewed·Dec 21, 2020
- In Vivo Structural Connectivity of the Reward System Along the Hippocampal Long-Axis
Blake L. Elliott, Raana A. Mohyee, … Vishnu P. Murty·HippocampusPeer-reviewed·May 3, 2024
- Distinct striatal subregions and corticostriatal connectivity for effort, action and reward
Shosuke Suzuki, Victoria M. Lawlor, … Michael Tilghman Treadway·bioRxiv·Feb 12, 2020
- Dopamine Release Plateau and Outcome Signals in Dorsal Striatum Contrast with Classic Reinforcement Learning Formulations
Min Jung Kim, Daniel J. Gibson, … Ann M. Graybiel·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Oct 14, 2024
- Dopamine waves as a mechanism for spatiotemporal credit assignment
Arif Hamid, Michael J. Frank, Christopher I. Moore·CellPeer-reviewed·Apr 15, 2021