PLoS ONEBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
tbiExtractor: A framework for Extracting Traumatic Brain Injury Common Data Elements from Radiology Reports
Margaret Y. Mahan, Daniel RafteriD, Hannah L. CaseyiD, Marta EngelkingiD, Tessneem AbdallahiD, Charles L. Truwit, Mark C. OswoodiD, Uzma SamadaniiD
Abstract
ObjectiveThe manual extraction of valuable data from electronic medical records is cumbersome, error-prone, and inconsistent. By automating extraction in conjunction with standardized terminology, the quality and consistency of data utilized for research and clinical purposes would be substantially improved. Here, we set out to develop and validate a framework to extract pertinent clinical conditions for traumatic brain injury (TBI) from computed tomography (CT) reports.\n\nMaterials and MethodsWe developed tbiExtractor, which extends pyConTextNLP, a regular expression algorithm using negation detection and contextual features, to create a framework for extracting TBI common data elements from radiology reports. The algorithm inputs radiology reports and outputs a structured summary containing 27 clinical findings with their respective annotations. Development and validation of the algorithm was completed using two physician annotators as the gold standard.\n\nResultstbiExtractor displayed high sensitivity (0.92-0.94) and specificity (0.99) when compared to the gold standard. The algorithm also demonstrated a high equivalence (94.6%) with the annotators. A majority of clinical findings (85%) had minimal errors (F1 Score [≥] 0.80). When compared to annotators, tbiExtractor extracted information in significantly less time (0.3 sec vs 1.7 min per report).\n\nDiscussion and ConclusiontbiExtractor is a validated algorithm for extraction of TBI common data elements from radiology reports. This automation reduces the time spent to extract structured data and improves the consistency of data extracted. Lastly, tbiExtractor can be used to stratify subjects into groups based on visible damage by partitioning the annotations of the pertinent clinical conditions on a radiology report.
- research focus: benchmarking
- research focus: database / resource
- research focus: software / tool
- approach: statistical model
- approach: experimental assay
- Citations
- 8
- FWCI
- 0.49
- Field percentile
- top 44%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Tagger: BeCalm API for rapid named entity recognition
Lars Juhl Jensen·bioRxiv·Mar 8, 2017
- Brain strain rate response: addressing computational ambiguity and experimental data for model validation
Z. Zhou, X. Li, … S. Kleiven·bioRxiv·Feb 4, 2022
- Brain Injury Knowledge Ontology (BIKO) for traumatic brain injury: Formalizing concepts and methods used in translational traumatic brain injury research.
Monique C. Surles-Zeigler, Troy Sincomb, … Maryann Elizabeth Martone·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2023
- Mining the neuroimaging literature
Jérôme Dockès, Kendra Oudyk, … Jean‐Baptiste Poline·eLifePeer-reviewed·Sep 11, 2025
- Reading eye movements in traumatic brain injury
Ashwini V C Reddy, Revathy Mani, … Jameel Rizwana Hussaindeen·Journal of OptometryPeer-reviewed·Nov 26, 2019
- Open Data Commons for Preclinical Traumatic Brain Injury Research: Empowering Data Sharing and Big Data Analytics
Austin Chou, Abel Torres Espin, … Adam R. Ferguson·Neurotrauma ReportsPeer-reviewed·Apr 5, 2022