Accurate prediction of orthologs in the presence of divergence after duplication
Abstract
MotivationWhen gene duplication occurs, one of the copies may become free of selective pressure and evolve at an accelerated pace. This has important consequences on the prediction of orthology relationships, since two orthologous genes separated by divergence after duplication may differ in both sequence and function. In this work, we make the distinction between the primary orthologs, which have not been affected by accelerated mutation rates on their evolutionary path, and the secondary orthologs, which have. Similarity-based prediction methods will tend to miss secondary orthologs, whereas phylogeny-based methods cannot separate primary and secondary orthologs. However, both types of orthology have applications in important areas such as gene function prediction and phylogenetic reconstruction, motivating the need for methods that can distinguish the two types.\n\nResultsWe formalize the notion of divergence after duplication, and provide a theoretical basis for the inference of primary and secondary orthologs. We then put these ideas to practice with the HyPPO (Hybrid Prediction of Paralogs and Orthologs) framework, which combines ideas from both similarity and phylogeny approaches. We apply our method to simulated and empirical datasets, and show that we achieve superior accuracy in predicting primary orthologs, secondary orthologs and paralogs.\n\nAvailabilityHyPPO is a modular framework with a core developed in Python, and is provided with a variety of C++ modules. The source code is available at https://github.com/manuellafond/HyPPO.\n\nContactmlafond2@uOttawa.ca, mmegh021@uottawa.ca, sankoff@uottawa.ca
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 27
- FWCI
- 1.51
- Field percentile
- top 18%
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics
David Emms, Steven L. Kelly·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 14, 2019
- The frequency and topology of pseudoorthologs
M. L. Smith, M. W. Hahn·bioRxiv·Feb 17, 2021
- Unveiling the Functional Fate of Duplicated Genes Through Expression Profiling and Structural Analysis
Alex Warwick Vesztrocy, Natasha Glover, … Irene Julca·bioRxiv·Oct 29, 2024
- Systematic errors in orthology inference: a bug or a feature for evolutionary analyses?
P. Natsidis, P. Kapli, … M. J. Telford·bioRxiv·Nov 3, 2020
- Machine learning can identify orphans that have diverged into the ''twilight zone'' of sequence similarity
Emilios Tassios, Jori de Leuw, … Nikolaos Vakirlis·bioRxiv·Jun 6, 2025
- The Ortholog Conjecture Revisited: the Value of Orthologs and Paralogs in Function Prediction
Moses H. Stamboulian, Rafael F. Guerrero, … Predrag Radivojac A·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 4, 2020