Gene regulation network inference using k-nearest neighbor-based mutual information estimation- Revisiting an old DREAM
Lior ShachafiD, Elijah RobertsiD, Patrick CahaniD, Jie XiaoiD
Abstract
BackgroundA cell exhibits a variety of responses to internal and external cues. These responses are possible, in part, due to the presence of an elaborate gene regulatory network (GRN) in every single cell. In the past twenty years, many groups worked on reconstructing the topological structure of GRNs from large-scale gene expression data using a variety of inference algorithms. Insights gained about participating players in GRNs may ultimately lead to therapeutic benefits. Mutual information (MI) is a widely used metric within this inference/reconstruction pipeline as it can detect any correlation (linear and non-linear) between any number of variables (n-dimensions). However, the use of MI with continuous data (for example, normalized fluorescence intensity measurement of gene expression levels) is sensitive to data size, correlation strength and underlying distributions, and often requires laborious and, at times, ad hoc optimization. ResultsIn this work, we first show that estimating MI of a bi- and tri-variate Gaussian distribution using k-nearest neighbor (kNN) MI estimation results in significant error reduction as compared to commonly used methods based on fixed binning. Second, we demonstrate that implementing the MI-based kNN Kraskov-Stoogbauer-Grassberger (KSG) algorithm leads to a significant improvement in GRN reconstruction for popular inference algorithms, such as Context Likelihood of Relatedness (CLR). Finally, through extensive in-silico benchmarking we show that a new inference algorithm CMIA (Conditional Mutual Information Augmentation), inspired by CLR, in combination with the KSG-MI estimator, outperforms commonly used methods. ConclusionsUsing three canonical datasets containing 15 synthetic networks, the newly developed method for GRN reconstruction - which combines CMIA, and the KSG-MI estimator - achieves an improvement of 20-35% in precision-recall measures over the current gold standard in the field. This new method will enable researchers to discover new gene interactions or choose gene candidates for experimental validations.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 11
- FWCI
- 0.98
- Field percentile
- top 29%
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Post-inference Methods Of Prior Knowledge Incorporation In Gene Regulatory Network Inference
Ajay Nair, Madhu Chetty·bioRxiv·Mar 30, 2017
- Mutual Information Estimation For Transcriptional Regulatory Network Inference
Jonathan S. Ish-Horowicz, John E. Reid·bioRxiv·Jul 26, 2017
- Inductive Inference of Gene Regulatory Network Using Supervised and Semi-supervised Graph Neural Networks
Juexin Wang, Anjun Ma, … Trupti Joshi·Computational and Structural Biotechnology JournalPeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- BRANE Cut: Biologically-Related A priori Network Enhancement with Graph cuts for Gene Regulatory Network Inference
Aurélie Pirayre, Camille Couprie, … Jean-Christophe Pesquet·bioRxiv·Nov 20, 2015
- Reconstruction of Gene Regulatory Networks by integrating biological model and a recommendation system
Yijie Wang, Justin M. Fear, … Teresa M. Przytycka·Lecture notes in computer sciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2020
- MCPNet : A parallel maximum capacity-based genome-scale gene network construction framework
Tony C Pan, Sriram P. Chockalingam, … Srinivas Aluru·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Jun 1, 2023