Probing variability in a cognitive map using manifold inference from neural dynamics
Ryan J. LowiD, Sam LewalleniD, Dmitriy AronoviD, Rhino NeversiD, David W. TankiD
Abstract
Hippocampal neurons fire selectively in local behavioral contexts such as the position in an environment or phase of a task,1-3 and are thought to form a cognitive map of task-relevant variables.1,4,5 However, their activity varies over repeated behavioral conditions,6 such as different runs through the same position or repeated trials. Although widely observed across the brain,7-10 such variability is not well understood, and could reflect noise or structure, such as the encoding of additional cognitive information.6,11-13 Here, we introduce a conceptual model to explain variability in terms of underlying, population-level structure in single-trial neural activity. To test this model, we developed a novel unsupervised learning algorithm incorporating temporal dynamics, in order to characterize population activity as a trajectory on a nonlinear manifold--a space of possible network states. The manifolds structure captures correlations between neurons and temporal relationships between states, constraints arising from underlying network architecture and inputs. Using measurements of activity over time but no information about exogenous behavioral variables, we recovered hippocampal activity manifolds during spatial and non-spatial cognitive tasks in rats. Manifolds were low-dimensional and smoothly encoded task-related variables, but contained an extra dimension reflecting information beyond the measured behavioral variables. Consistent with our model, neurons fired as a function of overall network state, and fluctuations in their activity across trials corresponded to variation in the underlying trajectory on the manifold. In particular, the extra dimension allowed the system to take different trajectories despite repeated behavioral conditions. Furthermore, the trajectory could temporarily decouple from current behavioral conditions and traverse neighboring manifold points corresponding to past, future, or nearby behavioral states. Our results suggest that trial-to-trial variability in the hippocampus is structured, and may reflect the operation of internal cognitive processes. The manifold structure of population activity is well-suited for organizing information to support memory,1,5,14 planning,12,15,16 and reinforcement learning.17,18 In general, our approach could find broader use in probing the organization and computational role of circuit dynamics in other brain regions.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 73
- Organism
- Assay
- Research Focus
- Approach
Abstract summary
Claude Opus 5.5 · xhigh effort · 18 Oct 2026 · from the abstract · CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
An unsupervised algorithm with temporal dynamics recovers hippocampal activity manifolds in rats from neural activity alone, recasting trial-to-trial variability as movement along an extra manifold dimension.
Hippocampal cells fire differently on repeated runs through the same position or repeated trials, and it has stayed unclear whether that variability is noise or additional encoded information. Treating single-trial population activity as a trajectory on a learned nonlinear manifold lets the question be asked from activity alone, without conditioning on measured behaviour.
Key results
SuggestedUsing only activity measured over time, with no behavioural variables supplied, the method recovered low-dimensional hippocampal manifolds in rats during both spatial and non-spatial cognitive tasks, and those manifolds smoothly encoded task-related variables.
Reported from applying the new unsupervised algorithm to hippocampal recordings; the abstract gives no dimensionality, decoding accuracy, number of neurons or sessions, and no comparison with other dimensionality-reduction methods. · Abstract
SuggestedManifolds held an extra dimension beyond the measured behavioural variables: neurons fired as a function of overall network state, across-trial fluctuations tracked variation in the trajectory, and the extra dimension let the system follow different trajectories under repeated behavioural conditions.
Presented as agreement between the recovered manifolds and the authors' conceptual model of structured variability; no variance explained, significance test or per-neuron statistics appear in the abstract. · Abstract
SuggestedTrajectories could briefly decouple from the animal's current behavioural condition and pass through neighbouring manifold points corresponding to past, future or nearby behavioural states.
Described qualitatively; the abstract reports no frequency, duration or statistical criterion for these excursions. · Abstract
Methods, data and reproducibility
A conceptual model that explains trial-to-trial variability as population-level structure in single-trial activity, together with a new unsupervised learning algorithm that incorporates temporal dynamics and describes population activity as a trajectory on a nonlinear manifold capturing between-neuron correlations and temporal relationships between network states.
- hippocampal population activity recorded over time during spatial and non-spatial cognitive tasks · rat
Limitations (2)
- The abstract reports no comparison against existing latent-dynamics or dimensionality-reduction methods and no ground-truth simulation, so it is hard to tell how much of the recovered structure is a property of the algorithm. · noted in this summary
- The extra dimension is defined by exclusion, as structure beyond the behavioural variables the experimenters happened to measure; which variables those were, and how many neurons, sessions or animals were recorded, is not stated. · noted in this summary
Who should read:Read this if you analyse population recordings and want an unsupervised, dynamics-aware way to ask whether trial-to-trial variability is structured rather than noise.
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- The Primate Hippocampus Constructs a Temporal Scaffold Anchored to Behavioral Events
Jon W. Rueckemann, Yoni Browning, … Elizabeth A. Buffalo·bioRxiv·Nov 12, 2025
- Integration and multiplexing of positional and contextual information by the hippocampal network
Lorenzo Posani, Simona Cocco, Rémi Monasson·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Aug 14, 2018
- Abstract representations emerge in human hippocampal neurons during inference behavior
Hristos S. Courellis, Juri Mixha, … Ueli Rutishauser·bioRxiv·Nov 10, 2023
- Hippocampal neuronal activity is aligned with action plans
Ipshita Zutshi, Athina Apostolelli, … György Buzsáki·NaturePeer-reviewed·Jan 8, 2025
- Learning produces a hippocampal cognitive map in the form of an orthogonalized state machine
Weinan Sun, Johan Winnubst, … Nelson Spruston·bioRxiv·Aug 3, 2023
- Single-neuron spiking variability in hippocampus dynamically tracks sensory content during memory formation in humans
Leonhard Waschke, Fabian Kamp, … Douglas D. Garrett·Nature CommunicationsPeer-reviewed·Jan 2, 2025