F1000ResearchBioinformaticsPeer-reviewed journal article
Evaluation of methods to assign cell type labels to cell clusters from single-cell RNA-sequencing data
J. Javier Díaz-MejíaiD, Elaine C. Meng, Alexander R. PicoiD, Sonya A. MacParlandiD, Troy KetelaiD, Trevor J. PughiD, Gary D. BaderiD, John H. MorrisiD
- Citations
- 52
- FWCI
- 3.07
- Field percentile
- top 7%
Abstract
Identification of cell type subpopulations from complex cell mixtures using single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) data includes automated computational steps like data normalization, dimensionality reduction and cell clustering. However, assigning cell type labels to cell clusters is still conducted manually by most researchers, resulting in limited documentation, low reproducibility and uncontrolled vocabularies. Two bottlenecks to automating this task are the scarcity of reference cell type gene expression signatures and that some dedicated methods are available only as web servers with limited cell type gene expression signatures. In this study, we benchmarked four methods (CIBERSORT, GSEA, GSVA, and ORA) for the task of assigning cell type labels to cell clusters from scRNA-seq data. We used scRNA-seq datasets from liver, peripheral blood mononuclear cells and retinal neurons for which reference cell type gene expression signatures were available. Our results show that, in general, all four methods show a high performance in the task as evaluated by Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis (average AUC = 0.94, sd = 0.036), whereas Precision-Recall curve analyses show a wide variation depending on the method and dataset (average AUC = 0.53, sd = 0.24). CIBERSORT and GSVA were the top two performers. Additionally, GSVA was the fastest of the four methods and was more robust in cell type gene expression signature subsampling simulations. We provide an extensible framework to evaluate other methods and datasets at https://github.com/jdime/scRNAseq_cell_cluster_labeling.
- organism: human
- assay: scRNA-seq
- research focus: cell type annotation
- research focus: benchmarking
- approach: statistical model
- approach: benchmark study
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- scClassifR: Framework to accurately classify cell types in single-cell RNA-sequencing data
Vy Nguyen, Johannes Griss·bioRxiv·Dec 22, 2020
- A comparison of automatic cell identification methods for single-cell RNA-sequencing data
Tamim Abdelaal, Lieke Michielsen, … Ahmed Essam Mahfouz·Genome biologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 9, 2019
- Evaluation of Cell Type Annotation R Packages on Single Cell RNA-seq Data
Qianhui Huang, Yu Liu, … Lana Xia Garmire·Genomics Proteomics & BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Dec 24, 2020
- Clustering single-cell RNA-seq data by rank constrained similarity learning
Qinglin Mei, Guojun Li, Zhengchang Su·BioinformaticsPeer-reviewed·Apr 23, 2021
- SCSA: a cell type annotation tool for single-cell RNA-seq data
Yinghao Cao, Xiaoyue Wang, Gongxin Peng·Frontiers in GeneticsPeer-reviewed·May 12, 2020
- clustifyr: An R package for automated single-cell RNA sequencing cluster classification
Rui Fu, Austin E. Gillen, … Kent A. Riemondy·F1000ResearchPeer-reviewed·Apr 1, 2020