Religious beliefs and practices, political orientation, and distrust in healthcare predict attitudes toward mRNA vaccines in the United States
Erin D. SolomoniD, Eu Gene ChiniD, Kari A. Baldwin, Lauren L. BakeriD, James M. DuBoisiD
Abstract
Religion has contributed to societal divides regarding COVID-19 mRNA vaccines. In this study, we conducted a secondary analysis of a survey of U.S. adults (N=4939) focused on how religious affiliations, beliefs, and practices impact attitudes toward genetic and genomic activities, one of which was mRNA vaccines. The dataset included large samples of participants from six religious groups in the U.S. (Black Protestant, Catholic, Evangelical Protestant, Jewish, Mainline Protestant, and Muslim), as well as individuals who were atheist, agnostic, or spiritual. ANCOVA results indicated that Evangelical Protestant participants showed significantly less support for mRNA vaccines than other groups, while atheist participants were the most supportive. Muslim participants had the highest concerns, whereas atheist participants had the lowest. Regression analyses indicated the strongest predictors of support for mRNA vaccines were more spiritual community support for community health, followed by higher acceptance of evolution, more liberal political orientation, less distrust toward the healthcare system, higher frequency of attending religious activities, higher income, lower fundamentalist religious beliefs, and more spiritual community support for liberal reproductive and end of life views. The strongest predictors of concerns about mRNA vaccines were more distrust toward the healthcare system and more conservative political orientation, followed by less spiritual community support for community health, stronger beliefs about God in the body, more fundamentalist religious beliefs, and lower knowledge of genetics. The large sample size, and examination of a broad array of religious variables alongside distrust and political orientation offer new insights. These findings add to the literature on the culture wars surrounding mRNA vaccines, and can perhaps aid in future efforts to build trust and relationships between public health and religious communities.
02 /Specification & Classification
Click any tag to browse matching papers- Citations
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Field percentile
- top 33%
- Organism
- Approach
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Misinformation, Perceptions Towards COVID-19 and Willingness to be Vaccinated: A Population-Based Survey in Yemen
A. N. Bitar, M. Zawiah, … A. H. Khan·bioRxiv·Feb 25, 2021
- Debates about vaccines and climate change on social media networks: a study in contrasts
J. Schonfeld, E. Qian, … C. Bauch·bioRxiv·Nov 24, 2020
- Pre-existing immunity modulates responses to mRNA boosters
T. Dangi, S. Sanchez, … P. Penaloza-MacMaster·bioRxiv·Jun 27, 2022
- Differential clearance rate of proteins encoded on a self-amplifying mRNA vaccine in muscle and lymph nodes
Reo Kanechi, Tatsuya Shishido, … Marito Araki·bioRxiv·Oct 7, 2024
- Distinct SARS-CoV-2 antibody reactivity patterns elicited by natural infection and mRNA Vaccination
R. Ramiro de Assis, A. Jain, … P. L. Felgner·bioRxiv·Apr 15, 2021
- Sustained Humoral Activation through self-amplifying mRNA Vaccination Enhances Longitudinal Antibody Function in a Phase III Trial
Kate S Levine, Ross Blanc, … Ryan P. McNamara·The Journal of ImmunologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 28, 2026