PLoS Computational BiologyNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Frontal cortex tracks surprise separately for different sensory modalities but engages a common inhibitory control mechanism
Abstract
The brain constantly generates predictions about the environment to guide action. Unexpected events lead to surprise and can necessitate the modification of ongoing behavior. Surprise can occur for any sensory domain, but it is not clear how these separate surprise signals are integrated to affect motor output. By applying a trial-to-trial Bayesian surprise model to human electroencephalography data recorded during a cross-modal oddball task, we tested whether there are separate predictive models for different sensory modalities (visual, auditory), or whether expectations are integrated across modalities such that surprise in one modality decreases surprise for a subsequent unexpected event in the other modality. We found that while surprise was represented in a common frontal signature across sensory modalities (the fronto-central P3 event-related potential), the single-trial amplitudes of this signature more closely conformed to a model with separate surprise terms for each sensory domain. We then investigated whether surprise-related fronto-central P3 activity indexes the rapid inhibitory control of ongoing behavior after surprise, as suggested by recent theories. Confirming this prediction, the fronto-central P3 amplitude after both auditory and visual unexpected events was highly correlated with the fronto-central P3 found after stop-signals (measured in a separate stop-signal task). Moreover, surprise-related and stopping-related activity loaded onto the same component in a cross-task independent components analysis. Together, these findings suggest that medial frontal cortex maintains separate predictive models for different sensory domains, but engages a common mechanism for inhibitory control of behavior regardless of the source of surprise.\n\nAuthor summarySurprise is an elementary cognitive computation that the brain performs to guide behavior. We investigated how the brain tracks surprise across different senses: Do unexpected sounds make subsequent unexpected visual stimuli less surprising? Or does the brain maintain separate expectations of environmental regularities for different senses? We found that the latter is the case. However, even though surprise was separately tracked for auditory and visual events, it elicited a common signature over frontal cortex in both sensory domains. Importantly, we observed the same neural signature when actions had to be stopped after non-surprising stop-signals in a motor inhibition task. This suggests that this signature reflects a rapid interruption of ongoing behavior when our surroundings do not conform to our expectations.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: cell type annotation
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 32
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Field percentile
- top 11%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Beta bursts over frontal cortex track the surprise of unexpected events in auditory, visual, and tactile modalities
Joshua R. Tatz, Alec Mather, Jan R. Wessel·Journal of Cognitive NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jan 1, 2023
- Surprise About Sensory Event Timing Drives Cortical Transients in the Beta Frequency Band
Thomas Meindertsma, Niels A Kloosterman, … Tobias H. Donner·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Jul 20, 2018
- Sudden sensory events trigger modality-independent responses across layers in the mouse neocortex
Diego Benusiglio, Hiroki Asari·bioRxiv·Nov 7, 2024
- The Latency of a Domain-General Visual Surprise Signal is Attribute Dependent
Benjamin G. Lowe, Naohide Yamamoto, … Patrick Johnston·CortexPeer-reviewed·Nov 26, 2025
- Surprise: a unified theory and experimental predictions
Alireza Modirshanechi, Johanni Brea, Wulfram Gerstner·Journal of Mathematical PsychologyPeer-reviewed·Sep 1, 2022
- Neurocomputational underpinnings of expected surprise
Françoise Lecaignard, Olivier Bertrand, … Jérémie Mattout·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Nov 24, 2021