Journal of NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
Neurocomputational underpinnings of expected surprise
Françoise LecaignardiD, Olivier BertrandiD, Anne CacliniD, Jérémie MattoutiD
Abstract
Predictive coding accounts of brain functions profoundly influence current approaches to perceptual synthesis. However, a fundamental paradox has emerged, that may be very relevant for understanding hallucinations, psychosis or cognitive inflexibility. This paradox is that in some situations surprise or prediction error related responses can decrease when predicted and yet, they can increase when we know they are predictable. This paradox is resolved by recognizing that brain responses reflect precision weighted prediction error. This then presses us to disambiguate the contributions of precision and prediction error in electrophysiology. We report, for the first time, an experimental paradigm that may be able to meet this challenge. We examined brain responses to unexpected and expected surprising sounds, assuming that the latter yield a smaller prediction error but much more amplified by a larger precision weight. Importantly, addressing this modulation requires the modelling of trial-by-trial variations of brain responses, that we reconstructed within a fronto-temporal network by combining EEG and MEG. Our results reveal an adaptive learning of surprise with larger integration of past (relevant) information in the context of expected surprises. Within the auditory hierarchy, this adaptation was found tied down to specific connections and reveals in particular and crucially precision encoding through neuronal excitability. Strikingly, these fine processes are automated as sound sequences were unattended. These findings directly speak to applications in psychiatry, where it has been suggested that a specifically impaired precision weighting is at the heart of several conditions such as schizophrenia and autism.
- organism: human
- assay: electronic health records
- research focus: differential expression
- approach: statistical model
- Citations
- 37
- FWCI
- 3.42
- Field percentile
- top 7%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Can expectation suppression be explained by reduced attention to predictable stimuli?
Arjen Alink, Helen Blank·NeuroImagePeer-reviewed·Feb 5, 2021
- Attention Promotes the Neural Encoding of Prediction Errors
Cooper Smout, Matthew F. Tang, … Jason B. Mattingley·PLoS BiologyPeer-reviewed·Feb 27, 2019
- Neural Responses to Unexpected Stimulus Repetitions and Omissions in Auditory Cortex Provide Mixed Evidence for Predictive Coding
Bhanu Shukla, Harry Shirley, … Yale E. Cohen·bioRxiv·Apr 1, 2026
- Stimulus-specific prediction error neurons in mouse auditory cortex
Nicholas J. Audette, David M. Schneider·Journal of NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Sep 12, 2023
- The Latency of a Domain-General Visual Surprise Signal is Attribute Dependent
Benjamin G. Lowe, Naohide Yamamoto, … Patrick Johnston·CortexPeer-reviewed·Nov 26, 2025
- Frontal cortex tracks surprise separately for different sensory modalities but engages a common inhibitory control mechanism
Jan R. Wessel, David E. Huber·PLoS Computational BiologyPeer-reviewed·Jul 29, 2019