henhaobio
Sign in

Journal of Cognitive NeuroscienceNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article

Beta bursts over frontal cortex track the surprise of unexpected events in auditory, visual, and tactile modalities

Joshua R. TatziD, Alec MatheriD, Jan R. WesseliD

PDFDOIPreprint

Abstract

One of the fundamental ways in which the brain regulates and monitors behavior is by making predictions about the sensory environment and adjusting behavior when those expectations are violated. As such, surprise is one of the fundamental computations performed by the human brain. In recent years, it has been well-established that one key aspect by which behavior is adjusted during surprise is inhibitory control of the motor system. Moreover, since surprise automatically triggers inhibitory control without much proactive influence, it can provide unique insights into largely reactive control processes. Recent years have seen tremendous interest in burst-like {beta} frequency events in the human (and non-human) local field potential - especially over (pre)frontal cortex) - as a potential signature of inhibitory control. To date, {beta}-bursts have only been studied in paradigms involving a substantial amount of proactive control (such as the stop-signal task). Here, we used two cross-modal oddball tasks to investigate whether surprise processing is accompanied by increases in scalp-recorded {beta}-bursts. Indeed, we found that unexpected events in all tested sensory domains (haptic, auditory, visual) were followed by low-latency increases in {beta}-bursting over frontal cortex. Across experiments, {beta}-burst rates were positively correlated with estimates of surprise derived from Shannons information theory, a type of surprise that represents the degree to which a given stimulus violates prior expectations. As such, the current work clearly implicates frontal {beta}-bursts as a signature of surprise processing. We discuss these findings in the context of common frameworks of inhibitory and cognitive control after unexpected events.

Citations
19
FWCI
2.69
Field percentile
top 10%

Reproducibility ledger

Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.

Sign in to file a reproducibility report.

Similarity Map
SelectedSame fieldCross-field
THISWessel '19Meindertsma '18Errington '22Errington '20Soh '20Zhang '18
86% semantic matchNeuroscience
Jan R. Wessel, David E. Huber·PLoS Computational Biology·Jul 29, 2019· 32 citations