Scientific ReportsNeurosciencePeer-reviewed journal article
An optimality principle for locomotor central pattern generators
Abstract
Two types of neural circuits contribute to legged locomotion: central pattern generators (CPGs) that produce rhythmic motor commands (even in the absence of feedback, termed "fictive locomotion"), and reflex circuits driven by sensory feedback. Each circuit alone serves a clear purpose, and the two together are understood to cooperate during normal locomotion. The difficulty is in explaining their relative balance objectively within a control model, as there are infinite combinations that could produce the same nominal motor pattern. Here we propose that optimization in the presence of uncertainty can explain how the circuits should best be combined for locomotion. The key is to re- interpret the CPG in the context of state estimator-based control: an internal model of the limbs that predicts their state, using sensory feedback to optimally balance competing effects of environmental and sensory uncertainties. We demonstrate use of optimally predicted state to drive a simple model of bipedal, dynamic walking, which thus yields minimal energetic cost of transport and best stability. The internal model may be implemented with classic neural half-center circuitry, except with neural parameters determined by optimal estimation principles. Fictive locomotion also emerges, but as a side effect of estimator dynamics rather than an explicit internal rhythm. Uncertainty could be key to shaping CPG behavior and governing optimal use of feedback. New and NoteworthySensory feedback modulates the central pattern generator (CPG) rhythm in locomotion, but there lacks an explanation for how much feedback is appropriate. We propose destabilizing noise as a determinant, where an uncertain environment demands more feedback, but noisy sensors demand less. We reinterpret the CPG as an internal model for predicting body state despite noise. Optimizing its feedback yields robust and economical gait in a walking model, and explains the advantages of feedback-driven CPG control.
- Citations
- 41
- FWCI
- 2.13
- Field percentile
- top 13%
Reproducibility ledger
Nobody has reported trying to reproduce this paper yet. Did you replicate an experiment or run the code? Your report saves the next lab a week.
Sign in to file a reproducibility report.
Related papers
- Investigating the roles of reflexes and central pattern generators in the control and modulation of human locomotion using a physiologically plausible neuromechanical model
Andrea Di Russo, Dimitar Stanev, … Auke Jan Ijspeert·Journal of Neural EngineeringPeer-reviewed·Sep 27, 2023
- On the organization of the locomotor CPG: insights from split-belt locomotion and mathematical modeling
Elizaveta M. Latash, Charly G. Lecomte, … Yaroslav I. Molkov·Frontiers in NeurosciencePeer-reviewed·Oct 16, 2020
- Model of a bilateral Brown-type central pattern generator for symmetric and asymmetric locomotion
Anton R. Sobinov, Sergiy Yakovenko·Journal of NeurophysiologyPeer-reviewed·Nov 29, 2017
- A simple CPG-based model to generate human hip moment pattern in walking by generating stiffness and equilibrium point trajectories
A. Bahramian, F. Towhidkhah, S. Jafari·bioRxiv·Aug 15, 2019
- The BCM rule allows a spinal cord model to learn rhythmic movements
Matthias Köhler, Philipp Stratmann, … Henrik Jörntell·Biological CyberneticsPeer-reviewed·Aug 18, 2023
- Neuromechanical phase lag predicts material and neural control properties in Caenorhabditis elegans
Jack E. Denham, Thomas Ranner, Netta Cohen·bioRxiv·May 1, 2018